The focus on immigration has centred on the Islamic issue in recent years because it has been the most obvious symptom of mass immigration, and especially recently with events in Germany it has become a major talking point. People talk about the Islamic issue as if it is the only issue, but it isn’t, Islam is a symptom of a much bigger disease which is enforced multiculturalism and mass immigration as a whole. Organisations that focus only on the mass Islamic immigration we have seen, but ignore all other immigration and actually say they support multiculturalism and only oppose Islamic extremism are actually part of the problem.
Of course Islam is a problem, it is a massive problem, but the reason we have over 50 million Muslims in Europe is because of the all encompassing phenomenon of mass immigration which has brought to our shores a mass monolithic tide of non-European immigrants that are doing irreparable damage to the historical identity of our continent.
This brings me on to my next point. Do those people who oppose mass Islamic immigration and the manifestation of Islam in our nations and the tens of millions of Muslims now walking our European streets ever ask how we ended up in this situation? Do they ever ask who has been behind it or do they really do enough research to understand the answer to this question? Or do they ignore it and believe that all of these Muslims just arrived in Europe one sunny day with nobody noticing? Do they not question who would want European nations destroyed? Do they not ask who benefits? In whose interest would it be to see European homogeneity undermined and weakened? The mass immigration we have seen has not been an accident, it hasn’t been for economic reasons although huge profits have been made by a select few, it hasn’t been about diversity or enrichment, so what has it been about?
Mass Immigration in all its forms not just Islamic, is about the ruination of the racial and cultural identity of the indigenous European population. For what other purpose would it have been imposed upon us? The economic argument is a lie because you don’t replace your own people for economic reasons, we have posted about the difference between guest worker immigration for a fixed term and citizenship immigration which is permanent. If you absolutely needed immigration for economic reasons you would employ a system of guest worker immigration and not permanent race replacement immigration.
So who benefits? It is to easy to say that politicians are behind it, they are merely the public face of a hidden hand, they are puppets who implement the policies of the international financiers although political parties benefit due to voting blocs among the immigrant population, but that isn’t why they have been brought here. It is true that big business benefits, but they don’t make the decisions they simply rake in the profits of imported cheap labour, the corporations and the capitalist class would sell their own grandmother for profit and don’t care about the long term consequences of Mass Immigration so long as their profit margins are high. Mass Immigration has been used as a biological weapon against the European people, it has been a tool of divide and conquer, but who would want to divide and conquer the European people and for what reason?
There is one group of people who wield enormous and disproportionate power in European and Western nations in media and finance and who influence political decision making not just domestically but internationally. This group have an historical enmity towards the European people that many people are unaware of and as result do not understand the true motivation behind Mass Immigration or the group responsible for it. This historical antipathy towards the West and to the European people is kept from the public consiousness because it would expose the true agenda behind Mass Immigration. If you haven’t guessed already, I am talking about Jewish supremacists who wield this enormous and disproportionate power and who influence politicians with financial incentives to implement policies that benfit Jews as a group. It is pretty much common knowledge that Jewish money influences Western nations to support Israel, but what isn’t so well known is that the same money power influences governments to implement a policy of ‘multiculturalism’ and Mass Immigration because it benefits Jews within Western nations. They do this because of historical animosity towards us, an act of revenge for what they call the oppression of the Jews because the Jews never do anything to bring the wrath of people whom the live amongst down upon them do they. They do it because they feel ‘safer’ in a population that is racially and culturally mixed, because homogeneous European nations had identified Jews as a corrosive force and had kicked them out. Within a multicultural multiracial multifaith society they become just one group among many. Racial and Cultural pluralism is their safety net and is also a malevolent act of sinister intent. Another reason for their implementation of a multifaith society ie importing Islam en mass, is their hatred and fear of Christianity, at the same time as racially consious European nations had identified Jews as being a corrosive out-group, they were also predominantly Christian and viewed Jews as being anti-Christian and proceeded to expel Jews from European nations. So the motivation for Jews to promote and support ‘multiculturalism’ is both racial and religious. This is the main reason why Europe now has 50 million Muslims among its population, and is being destroyed by Mass Immigration as a whole.
Some quotes that should leave you in no doubt whatsoever about the real reason for mass immigration:
“I think there’s a resurgence of antisemitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural, and I think we’re going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural.. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode, and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role, and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.” – Barbara Lerner Spectre
A typical example of what characterises the Jewish push for open immigration can be seen in the following 1948 quote by David Petegorsky, former Director of the AJ Congress:
“Jewish survival can only take place within the framework of a progressive and expanding democratic society, which through its institutions and public policies gives expression to the concept of cultural pluralism.”
In his 1985 book A Certain People: American Jews and Their Lives Today. Charles Silberman writes that:
“American (and European based) Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief, one firmly rooted in history, that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse “gay rights” and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called “social issues.”
Earl Raab, executive director emeritus of the Perlmutter Institute of Jewish Advocacy, an associate of the ADL (Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith) and writer for the San Francisco Jewish Bulletin, wrote:
“It was only after World War II that immigration law was drastically changed to eliminate such discrimination. In one of the first pieces of evidence of its political coming-of-age, the Jewish community has a leadership role in effecting those changes.”
Raab goes on to celebrate the coming minority status of Whites in America. Once that has happened, he looks forward to “constitutional constraints” (restriction of freedom of speech?):
“The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.”
“We have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to ethnic bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever.”
“Arab migration has been the best thing that’s happened to Europe in the past 50 years. Arabs in Europe are a fact of life. It’s time we started to accept that there’s no way to block the migration of Chinese, Pakistanis or Arabs to Europe. … It’s true, Europe won’t be what it once was, but that’s a good thing. … [The] more migrants from Africa and Asia who arrive, the better off Europe will be. Sooner or later, their children and grandchildren will marry into veteran European families and change the demographics of their countries. Europe will be different.”
Yigal Ben-Nun, Israeli Writer in an Haaretz article 15.11.13
“For perhaps another generation, an optimistic forecast, the Jewish community will be in a position where it will be in a position to divide and conquer and enter into selective coalitions to support our agendas.” – Stephen Steinlight, “The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography.” Center for Immigration Studies, October, 2001
“We, the Greens [Green Party] have to make sure to get as many immigrants as possible into Germany. If they are in Germany, we must fight for their right to vote. When we reach that, we will have a share of the vote, we need to change this republic.” – Daniel Cohn-Bendit, (Jewish Communist) Co-president of the European Greens–European Free Alliance group in the European Parliament.
“In the modern Europe there is no room for homogeneous national states. It was an idea from 1800s, and we are going to carry it (multi-culturalism) through…and we are going to create multi-ethnic states.” – General Wesley Clark commenting on CNN after the war on Serbia.
“Jews should rejoice at the fact that Christian Europe is losing its identity as a punishment for what it did to us for the hundreds of years were in exile there.
“We will never forgive Europe’s Christians for slaughtering millions of our children, women and elderly. Not just in the recent Holocaust, but throughout the generations, in a consistent manner which characterizes all factions of hypocritical Christianity.
“And now, Europe is losing its identity in favor of another people and another religion, and there will be no remnants and survivors from the impurity of Christianity, which shed a lot of blood it won’t be able to atone for.
“Even if we are in a major war with the region’s Arabs over the Land of Israel, Islam is still much better as a gentile culture than Christianity. Jews must pray that the Islamization of most of Europe will not harm the people of Israel.” – Rabbi Baruch Efrati, a yeshiva head and community rabbi in the West Bank settlement of Efrat
Groups that ignore this crucial aspect of Mass Immigration are not only not telling the whole story, but are doing themselves a disservice. Some groups purposefully leave out this narrative because they are pro-Jewish philo semites and have Jewish influences within their organisation providing financial support this is especially true among many counter jihad groups. Again this influence is not geared towards the best interests of Europe or Europeans. What you will find is that these groups openly speak of their support for Israel when the issue at hand is not Israel but the survival of the European people. The anti-Islamic narrative of the counter jihad groups which is right in theory for our own continent, is used by the Jewish element to whip up support for Israel. Their motivation is purely to gain support for Israel and not for the preservation of the European people. An example of this kind of strategy is somebody like Melanie Phillips who comes across as being anti-Islam and anti-immigration, but is a staunch Zionist who never fails to expose her anti-Islam stance as being nothing more than a ruse for her desire to harness support for Israel. Counter Jihad groups who fall for this are being used to advance the interests of Jews and Israel and are being led astray from what is really important in terms of defending Europe.
One way in which to identify this deception is to see how these same Counter Jihad groups support multiculturalism, gays rights, and a whole host of other anti-Western subversive agendas. If these Counter Jihad groups stated their opposition to ALL immigration and the destructive concept of multiracialism and ‘diversity’ then you would see Jewish support for these groups dissappear because they would no longer be serving the overall Jewish interest. “Oppose Islamic extremism and support Israel” they say, but don’t dare acknowledge and advocate your own racial interests because that runs counter to their overall Jewish agenda. Counter Jihad groups almost never speak about race, their argument is always pushed down the road of ‘it isn’t about race’ when it has everything to do with race. They are terrified of speaking in racial terms for fear of being labeled ‘nazi’ and losing the support of Jewish finance. When was the last time you heard a Counter Jihad leader speak about the preservation of the white race?
There are some very intelligent and articulate people involved in the Counter Jihad movement, but I’m not having it that these same intelligent and articulate people who speak out about Mass Immigration and Islamic extremism are not aware of the extensive and disproportionate Jewish role in not only opening our borders, but promoting and supporting the idea of ‘multiculturalism’ just without the Islamic extremism. If this Islamic extremism didn’t exist, would the Counter Jihad groups exist? Would they still be forming groups and organising demos? Or would they then be quite happy to see European nations destroyed racially and culturally simply because Islamic extremism wasn’t an issue? Would they still receive Jewish support if they did oppose the racial and cultural annihilation of Europe? I think not.
What we are seeing across Europe is an extreme form of racial nihilism and it is even prevalent among some so-called ‘nationalist’ groups.
Nihilism is the lack of belief in anything, the rejection of all moral principles. The deliberate refusal of belief, to the point that belief itself is rejected as untenable.
As moral nihilism commonly asserts that morality does not exist, so racial nihilism often denies the existence of races, claiming that nothing exists to preserve or conserve. This is racial deconstructionism , the ideological annihilation of race or ideological reduction of race to nothingness, defining race out of existence by “deconstructing” its terms or classifications.
Racial nihilism is the opposite or antithesis of racial preservationism and conservationism. It is opposed to racial preservation (continued racial life), and to the conditions required for preservation (separation and reproductive isolation). In ideological terms, racial nihilism can be defined as any system of ideas, beliefs and values that opposes racial preservation and conservation, that supports or promotes the causes of racial destruction or devolution, or that denies racial rights, especially the racial right to life and the conditions of separation required for continued racial life (racial preservation). (1)
It is this refusal to accept the reality of our racial predicament that Jewish groups rely on. It should come as no surprise to learn that Jews have been at the forefront of attempts to
remove the reality of race in the minds of Europeans. (2)
To sum up, the scores of millions of Muslims on our continent represent a clear and present danger to our civilisation, this is an undeniable reality that only a fool would attempt to deny. However they make up just one part of the immigration population and despite being the most dangerous body, are part of a wider agenda which encompasses mass non-European immigration in its entirety. Islam isn’t separate, it is part of the same anti-European agenda as the mass immigration of African Christians, Sikhs, Chinese etc. They all constitute a non-European collective that are designed to displace and replace us. Continuing to ignore this only empowers and emboldens those who work towards our eventual racial and cultural demise.