Racial Nihilism


Racial Nihilism


Richard McCulloch

Life is a continuum of generations. The existence of each generation is temporary, limited in time, but the existence of the larger life of which the generation is a passing part continues through the successive generations, each succeeding and replacing its predecessor. Each generation is part of the same life, and its foremost task is to continue that life by the successful creation of the next generation, which will replace it and continue the life they hold in common. The different branches of life — species and races — are themselves separate and distinct continuums, composed not only of genetically similar individuals in the currently existing generation, but also of a potentially unlimited number of generations, each genetically linked with its ancestors and descendants.

Human continuums are cultural as well as genetic. Each generation transmits both its culture and its genes to its successors. Normally a racial continuum includes cultural as well as genetic transmissions. It is their racial continuum, to which they belong and of which they are a part, from which humans normally receive their identity, their sense of self and purpose, and within which they define themselves and their existence. The generations in the racial continuum come and go, and gradually evolve or change over time, but the life they embody and share in common continues through the continuum of its generations.

The continued existence of a continuum cannot be taken for granted. A continuum can cease to exist, can be ended, can cease to continue, in spite of the implications in its name, if any succeeding generation should ever fail to continue the legacy bequeathed to it by its ancestral generations. This applies to every type of continuum, whether cultural or genetic, of any species or race, or even of life itself as a whole. But only human continuums can be ended by choice. Only human races have the freedom of will to choose the ending of their continuum, the rejection or repudiation of their cultural or genetic heritage, the destruction or extinction of their racial type, the nonexistence of the life they embody. The choice of racial nonexistence over existence, of racial death over racial life, of racial discontinuation over continuation, the rejection or repudiation — or willingness to reject and repudiate — the racial continuum of which one is a part and to which one belongs, is racial nihilism.
The term nihilism is derived from the Latin nihilum , which means “nothing.” Nihilism is literally nothingism. There are various forms of nihilism, each either denying the existence, or promoting the nonexistence — through a reduction to nothing — of a continuum that has existed through many generations. Literary and artistic nihilism rejects and repudiates distinctions or standards in literary or artistic merit or value. Moral nihilism is the rejection and repudiation of moral distinctions, standards and values. Racial nihilism is the rejection and repudiation of all racial distinctions and values. It either denies racial existence or seeks its annihilation — literally, its reduction to nothingness or nonexistence.

The ideological motivation for nihilism is often a radical or extreme egalitarianism, which seeks to abolish all inequalities by abolishing all distinctions, differences and diversity, as well as all values and standards. But whatever its motivation or form — whether moral, cultural or racial — nihilism is an ideology of denial and destruction. It often denies the very existence of the continuum it repudiates and seeks to destroy, unwilling to admit that the object of its destructive intent even exists. As moral nihilism commonly asserts that morality does not exist, so racial nihilism often denies the existence of races, claiming that nothing exists to preserve or conserve. This is racial deconstructionism , the ideological annihilation of race or ideological reduction of race to nothingness, defining race out of existence by “deconstructing” its terms or classifications.

Racial nihilism is the opposite or antithesis of racial preservationism and conservationism. It is opposed to racial preservation (continued racial life), and to the conditions required for preservation (separation and reproductive isolation). In ideological terms, racial nihilism can be defined as any system of ideas, beliefs and values that opposes racial preservation and conservation, that supports or promotes the causes of racial destruction or devolution, or that denies racial rights, especially the racial right to life and the conditions of separation required for continued racial life (racial preservation).

An essential condition of nihilism is that it rejects and repudiates the continued existence of the continuum of which the nihilist is a part and to which the nihilist belongs. A racial nihilist must include their own race in their rejection of continued racial existence. They must reject and repudiate the continuation and preservation of their own racial continuum, their own ancestral line and heritage. Those who reject the continuation or preservation of their own race are racial nihilists regardless of whether or not they also oppose the continuation of other races. Thus some racial nihilists only reject the continuation or preservation of their own race, while approving the continuation of other races. Other racial nihilists reject the continuation of all races, all racial differences and all racial diversity, seeking an egalitarian leveling of all humanity into one uniform race consistent with the goal or dream of the “One World” ideology.

Racial nihilism, in its rejection of racial values, caring and love, and goal of racial leveling, holds that it is wrong to value, care for and love one’s race, and even more wrong to value, care for and love it more than others, or to accord it any preference or special concern. This is contrary to the natural tendency of life — and of human nature in particular — to value one’s own life and one’s own branch of life more than others, to accord them special concern, attention, love and devotion. But racial nihilism demands the egalitarian elimination of all racial particularities and distinctions in preferences and concerns, and asserts that it is wrong to value, care for and love one’s race in any degree, even the same as others, if that valuing, loving and caring includes a desire for the preservation and continuation of one’s own race as a particular type distinct from the others.

Racial nihilism can be passive as well as active, be characterized by acts of omission as well as commission, as the preservation or continuation of a continuum often requires positive, sustaining and affirming actions. The lack of racial caring or interest, the lack of affirmation of racial rights and values, and the acquiescence to the causes of racial destruction, are all examples of racial nihilism by default, the nihilism of indifference. This type of racial nihilism — a simple lack of interest, care and concern, often not consciously intended — is by far the most common form, and also the most insidious. No statement expresses the essence of nihilism more than the rhetorical question, “Who cares?” It is an expression of denial and rejection of caring, and even of contempt for caring. The foundations of nihilism are not so much a militant and active destructiveness as a much more pernicious resignation and passivity that rejects caring for and loving those things and values — including civilization, culture, freedom, morality and race — that require effort and commitment to uphold, maintain and preserve. When nihilism rejects or denies the value or importance of something, or even denies its existence, it condones its sacrifice or destruction, and resents and condemns as immoral those who do care for, and seek to uphold and preserve, that which is threatened.

Under conditions of racial geographic separation and reproductive isolation, such as nurtured and preserved racial diversity for thousands of generations, a widespread indifference to racial concerns posed little danger to racial preservation, but under multiracial conditions, such as are becoming ever more common in the modern world, racial indifference has emerged as a major threat to the continuation of the different human racial continuums. If racial diversity is to be preserved in the modern world, where the preserving barriers of geographic distance have been overcome by advances in transportation, racial nihilism — even in its passive, acquiescent, indifferent and unconscious form — is a luxury humanity can no longer afford.

The two causes of racial destruction are intermixture and replacement. Intermixture causes racial destruction by genetic dilution or submergence, replacement involves one race being dispossessed — or “squeezed-out” — by others who take its place. Multiracialism is the ideology, or system of beliefs and values, that supports multiracial conditions and the resulting racially destructive processes of intermixture and replacement. Racial nihilism is the underlying ideology, psychological attitude or view of existence that provides the foundation for multiracialism by denying and rejecting racial rights and values, particularly the right of a race to life, independence, and the condition of separation required for both.

In the chain of causation, racial nihilism causes or supports multiracialism, which causes or promotes multiracial conditions, which cause — or make possible — racial intermixture and replacement, which cause racial destruction. Each leads to the other in a progression of cause and effect. Each also requires the other as a precondition for its existence, each effect requiring its cause. Thus racial destruction requires racial intermixture or replacement, which require multiracial conditions, which requires the effective dominance of multiracialism, which requires racial nihilist beliefs, attitudes and values — whether passive or active, conscious or unconscious, intended or unintended, knowing or unknowing. It follows that racial destruction by intermixture and replacement is an effectively unavoidable consequence of a multiracial society, but is effectively prevented in a monoracial society. The reasons why certain individuals interbreed with members of different races are many and varied, but only occur under multiracial conditions (where there is contact between different races). They do not occur under monoracial conditions of geographic racial separation and reproductive isolation, the conditions in which the different races were created and preserved until modern times.

A “wasteland” is a land, place, society or situation where life is deprived of the conditions it needs to exist. A multiracial society is a racial wasteland, where racial life cannot be continued, where the forces that cause racial death, destruction and extinction are dominant over those that promote racial life, preservation and continuation. In the Middle Ages the term “Wasteland” was used to refer to an orthodox religious ideology that denied and prevented individual freedom, uniqueness, growth and development, and promoted the submergence of the individual in the collective mass. The wasteland of the Modern Age is the secular faith or dogma of multiracialism — the interracialist and internationalist ideology of universalism or “Oneness” — that denies and prevents racial freedom (independence), uniqueness (variety and diversity), growth and development (divergent evolution), and continued racial life, and promotes the submergence of races in a multiracial “melting pot,” replacing the racially creative process of divergent evolution with the racially destructive process of convergent devolution.

The Oneness goal of “One World” and “One Race” seeks to eliminate human diversity by a process of blending or convergence of all into one, replacing the great variety of types with one uniform type. It began with the concept of “One Religion,” a universal religion for all humanity which would replace all other religions. This set the pattern for numerous secular universalist creeds which also sought to impose themselves on all humanity. The process of ideological missionary work, proselytizing and conversion, both religious and secular, continues on a vast scale to this day, promoted by the universalist goal of Oneness, which is consistent with multiracialist and racial nihilist ideology.

The modern multiracial society is a racial wasteland, and its orthodox ideology is racial nihilism, promoted and enforced by both secular and religious authorities or priesthoods. All “mainstream” cultural, political and social institutions conform to it. Any deviance from its doctrines, particularly any manifestation of racial preservationism, is marginalized to a fringe position outside the “mainstream,” where it is denied serious consideration as an alternative.

Racial nihilism seeks racial nonexistence, and it tends to deny or minimize the value, or even the existence, of the entity whose nonexistence it seeks. Given its interest in denying, ignoring or minimizing the value and importance of racial existence — sometimes to the extent of denying that races really exist — so as to justify its denial of the racial right to existence, racial nihilism is inherently hostile toward any affirmation or acknowledgment of the reality of racial existence. Given the dominant status of racial nihilism in the mass communications media and educational institutions, a situation exists where racial knowledge and appreciation are discouraged, and any objective study or discussion of racial matters — of racial differences and diversity, or the conditions required for continued racial existence — is regarded as a forbidden subject, and effectively repressed, banned or censored.

Racial nihilism, in its denial and rejection of the value and importance of race, racial diversity and racial existence, has made race a “bad” word, taboo for all but its priesthood, who are entrusted with its use or incantation solely for the purpose of promoting the racial nihilist agenda of racial destruction.

Racial nihilism has created an air of unreality with regard to racial matters, where the subjects of racial evolution, variation, diversity, differences, uniqueness and continued existence are confronted with evasion, dissimulation or denial, where it is regarded as morally proper to pretend that races and racial differences do not exist, and where those who openly acknowledge, recognize and affirm these differences — and especially those who celebrate them and assert their value and importance — are regarded as immoral. In this ideological climate, human racial diversity and differences — the creation or work of nature through thousands of generations of divergent evolution — are denied, trivialized or belittled as unimportant and not worth preserving, or are actually regarded as immoral and as something which should be destroyed. It logically follows that racial rights are also denied or belittled, and their assertion regarded as immoral.

To the racial nihilist racial differences are something evil, and racial diversity, variation and uniqueness is something to be denied, belittled and destroyed rather than affirmed, loved and preserved. The racial nihilist seeks the egalitarianism of sameness and oneness, and wants all humanity to be the same, the rich diversity of human racial types to be reduced to one uniform type. Racial nihilism is racial egalitarianism in its most extreme form, eliminating all racial inequalities by the elimination of all racial diversity and differences.

Extreme racial nihilists deny the existence of races while working to destroy and undo racial existence. They believe it is immoral to even admit that different races exist, and it would seem that some “true believers” actually believe that races do not exist, as their ethical beliefs (that the existence of different races is immoral) and values (preference for a world without racial diversity) determine their factual beliefs. Others dissimulate, seeking the end of racial diversity and knowing that the denial of racial existence promotes the actual destruction of that existence. Racial rights cannot be logically acknowledged or defended if the existence of races is not recognized. Without the factual belief in the existence of races there is no basis for the ethical belief in racial rights.

The factual belief that there are no racial differences, or that they are trivial and unimportant, or that different races do not really exist, is often asserted to support the ethical belief that races have no right to life, liberty and independence, and to justify the denial and violation of those rights. If a race does not exist it has no rights that can be violated. By denying racial existence, racial nihilism can rationalize its opposition to racial rights and assume a moral pose while promoting racial destruction. But to be logically consistent, the denial of the existence of different human races not only requires the denial of the existence of genetically distinct human populations, but also the effective denial of the creative process of divergent evolution, and by implication the denial of the existence of all different life forms. If one is an illusion all are an illusion, and at this point racial nihilism becomes racial gnosticism.

Gnosticism is the belief that physical life and existence are not real, that everything in the material world is an illusion, without meaning or value. It is a form of metaphysical nihilism. Gnostics belittle or deny the importance — in fact the reality or existence — of all that is physical or material, claiming that the only true reality is nonmaterial or spiritual. They seek to escape from life and physical existence, or to end it. The word “gnosticism” is derived from the Greek word for knowledge, and the original gnostics — “those with knowledge” — were the initiates in the Greek Mystery religions. It was not until the Hellenistic period (the three centuries preceding the Christian era) that gnosticism became associated with a disbelief in the reality of physical existence. This development can be attributed in part to the influence of Indian Buddhist missionaries, who brought their ideas to the Mediterranean world during the Hellenistic era. [Note 3] In the Christian era various gnostic sects developed within Christianity which believed in an incorporeal or illusory Christ who never existed as a real or physical man.

As gnosticism does not believe in physical reality, but regards it as an illusion, so it also does not believe in the reality of any differences or distinctions in the material world. It believes that all people and peoples, all individuals and races, are the same, interchangeable and impersonal, that none are unique, different or special in any significant way. It follows that gnosticism is completely egalitarian, regarding all as equal and the same, with no important differences or distinctions. The gnostic is especially egalitarian in love, believing it is immoral to love any person or people more than any other, but that all people and peoples should be loved and valued equally. This egalitarian form of love was called agape in Greek, and it was applied equally to all, impersonally, without differentiation, distinction or discrimination. [Note 4] Both personal love and love for one’s race or people, which differentiate, discriminate and draw distinctions, which value a particular person or people more than others, were condemned. The gnostics practiced no exclusivity, loyalty or fidelity in love, advocating equal and nondiscriminating love for all, to be given equally to all, without preference or special emotions, loyalties or attachments. The gnostics were no more loyal or attached to their race, people or nation than they were to their sexual partners, professing themselves to be kosmopolites , cosmopolitans, or citizens of the world.

Gnosticism, in its denial and rejection of the reality and value of life and existence, is a quest for nonexistence, seeking the end of existence, the destruction of the continuum of the generations. Thus many of the gnostic sects, both pagan and Christian, condemned procreation as a continuation of the life and existence they sought to bring to an end. Racial gnosticism, the belief that race is not real, but an illusion without meaning, significance or value, also seeks the end of racial existence, the destruction of the racial continuum, and opposes procreation or anything else which tends to continue or preserve racial life.

The modern Western world has witnessed a resurgence of gnostic thinking, again — as in ancient times — largely influenced by Hindu and Buddhist thought. Much of the philosophy of the so-called “New Age” movement, a continuation of the “counterculture” which began in the mid-sixties, is directly attributable to Hindu and Buddhist influence, with many of its members proclaiming themselves to be followers of various Asian “gurus.” The strong current of gnosticism that runs through this movement should therefore come as no surprise.  The “love” which was the leitmotif of the counterculture was agapic love, the egalitarian and promiscuous love that is characteristic of gnosticism; universal, impersonal and nondiscriminating, unfocused, without any special intensity of emotion or feeling for any particular person, people or thing. In sexual relations this promiscuous love (agape) was euphemistically referred to as “free love.” In political and social matters it expressed itself as universalism and the cosmopolitan “One-World, One-Race, One-People” goal of Oneness.

Somewhat similar to gnosticism, and to some extent an ancestor or harbinger of it, and even more pervasive in its influence, is dualism , the factual belief that there are two realities or “planes” of existence, one material or physical and the other nonmaterial or spiritual. In a tradition dating back at least to Plato, it usually includes the belief that the physical dimension or plane is inferior to the spiritual. But dualism, although holding physical existence to be inferior to spiritual existence, differs from gnosticism in that it does recognize the reality of physical existence. Dualistic values are evident whenever the value or importance of the material world and natural, biological-physical existence is belittled as inferior to a supposed “higher plane” of non-material, spiritual or supernatural existence. Since biological existence or life is part of material existence, it — and all that is associated with it — is also, by extension, regarded as inferior. Typically, dualism regards race as a purely physical or biological phenomenon, without any existence in the spiritual plane. Whereas racial gnosticism denies the physical existence or reality of race, dualism recognizes its physical existence but denies its spiritual existence. The effects of these factual beliefs on ethical beliefs are very similar, with the result that both deny the value or importance of race.

The influence of dualism over both religious and secular thought has been sufficient to create a pervasive intellectual and ethical bias or prejudice against the physical or material, and by extension against biological existence, genes and race. This bias can be seen in the belief that the higher functions of the mind belong to a spiritual plane of existence unconnected to the biological-material plane (the mind-body dichotomy), and the resulting opposition to the idea that the mind and its traits could be determined or influenced by something physical such as genes, or created by something physical such as biological evolution. Dualism separates the existence of the mind from the physical body and brain, denying the material-biological basis of its existence. It rejects the role of genes, a physical-material structure, and evolution, a process of physical-material-biological genetic change, in the creation and determination of mental traits such as intelligence, personality and identity. Since dualism sees race as a physical-material-biological phenomenon, with racial traits and characteristics, differences, diversity and variation existing only in the material or physical “plane,” racial concerns are not regarded as valuable or important, but as inferior to spiritual or nonmaterial considerations.

The dualistic belief in more than one reality is not necessarily harmful to material reality. Nor is it necessarily harmful to material reality to judge it to be inferior. But it is harmful to material reality to judge it to be so inferior as to be without value, meaning, purpose or importance, or even to be an illusion which does not really exist — the belief that is the essence of gnosticism. It is harmful to material reality to regard everything that has a material or physical basis for existence — including the human body, the genes that determine its form and traits, and the process by which it was created — as unimportant. And it is harmful to material reality to regard the great continuums of physical-biological existence or life, including the diverse races of humanity, to be without value and unworthy of care, concern and preservation. This is the train of logic that leads from dualism and gnosticism to racial nihilism.

But gnosticism and dualism in general, and their influence on racial beliefs and values in particular, are only part of the explanation for the current dominance of racial nihilism in the Western world. The dominant trend of the “popular” or mass culture in recent times, from “pop” philosophy to “pop” psychology, has been to emphasize the individual while ignoring, denying, rejecting, violating and sacrificing the interests of the larger entity — the evolutionary continuum or race — of which the individual is a part and from which the individual came, the larger — and potentially immortal — genetic entity whose existence continues through the generations while the existence of the particular individual is limited to one generation. This cultural trend is not limited to the secular sphere, but dominates in the religious sphere as well, where the “salvation” that is promised is the salvation of the individual, not the salvation or continued life of the racial continuum to which the individual belongs.

Some racial nihilists are extreme individualists, who only recognize the rights of individuals (and perhaps only the existence of individuals) in a very atomistic sense, not recognizing the rights (and perhaps the existence) of the biological group of which they are a part, whose existence transcends the sum of its parts and is potentially immortal. This excessive preoccupation with the atomized individual, divorced or separated from the context of the larger genetic continuum of which it is a part, is a classic example of not being able to see the forest because of the trees. The individual entities, whether tree or human being, come and go in their generations, but the larger entity of which they are a part, whether forest or race, lives on. It is the enduring reality, the continuing reality, the continuum. The life of the individual is transient and passes quickly. It is the life of the forest or race that is potentially immortal. But one cannot exist without the other. The single individual and the forest or race, the part and the whole, both depend on the health and well-being of the other.

In ancient Greece persons who were excessively preoccupied with their own private or individual affairs, to the point of neglecting or rejecting their responsibilities or involvement in the larger entity of which they were a part, and thereby separating themselves from it, and from care or concern for its interests, were called idiotes . It is therefore etymologically correct to refer to the condition in which an individual is so preoccupied with their own private interests as to be separated from involvement in — and care and concern for — the interests of their race, as racial idiocy. This common condition of racial idiocy is a major cause of racial nihilism, in both its active and passive forms. In a healthy culture racial idiocy would be regarded as dysfunctional, but in the present culture the dominant position of racial nihilism enables the racial idiot to enjoy the conceit of moral superiority over those individuals who do not separate themselves from their race, but who care for it and promote its interests and preservation.

Another cause of racial nihilism is an excessive preoccupation with economic matters and concerns. As a result, racial considerations, including racial preservation and independence, are routinely subordinated to economic considerations. Much of the impetus behind the “One-World, One-Race” movement comes from economic interests. The call for a unified world economy without restrictions on the movement of “labor” (people), permitting the free movement or immigration of people into the homelands of other races, is a clear expression of racial nihilism, denying and violating the right of every race to life and independence by denying it the racially exclusive territory required for both. The essence of this form of racial nihilism is that it sees all people as interchangeable units of production and consumption, without any differences — including racial differences — worthy of caring about or preserving. It is willing, even eager, to sacrifice racial interests for the sake of economic gain. Typically, it promotes multiracial immigration for economic purposes (especially to lower labor costs) with racially destructive effects on the existing population (displacement and replacement, or extinction by intermixture and genetic submergence).

Racial nihilism, particularly in its more activist forms, is often associated with internationalism and the “One-World” goal of a world government. For many persons this goal is motivated by a desire to end war and conflict by establishing a rule of law among peoples, nations or races similar to the rule of law that government enforces among individuals. This rule of law is a worthy goal provided it is based on the concept of racial and national rights as well as individual rights, but many internationalists adopt the racial nihilist position that human conflict can only be abolished by the abolishment of human diversity and differences, by the destruction of whatever separates humanity into different types and distinguishes one type from the others. Some people sincerely believe that the world would be a better place if all the races would join and become one, and are motivated by this belief to support racial nihilism in the conscious knowledge of its racially destructive effects. (John Lennon’s song Imagine was an expression of this belief and desire.) Others are motivated by racial nihilism and the desire for racial annihilation — the reduction of race to nothingness — as an end in itself, and merely use internationalism as a pretext to justify their position and a cloak to cover their true motives.

The “One-World, One-Race” dream provides an effective vehicle to promote racial nihilism, as it allows no race a right to its own territory, independence or existence, but would consign them all to the multiracial “melting-pot,” where the traits that once distinguished the different races would exist only in solution, blended with all the others, effectively diluted out of existence. The dream of racial “Oneness” is really a simplistic and reductionist dream. It seeks to reduce the complex to the simple, to replace the many existing forms and types with one uniform type, by diluting racial differences to the point of nonexistence or nothingness. It would impose its dream upon nature, changing the course of nature, by replacing the complex racial diversity created by the natural process of divergent evolution with a simple uniformity caused by a process of convergent devolution. It is an irony of semantics that the racial intermixture that is often referred to as racial integration actually causes racial disintegration, the dissolution and destruction of races and racial diversity.

The influence of racial nihilism permeates contemporary culture. Its values are promoted in the schools and the churches, in print and on television, by teachers and preachers, journalists and talk-show hosts. Even so, the support for racial nihilism among the general population is more passive than active, more unconscious than conscious, more the result of ignorance and misplaced trust than knowledge and understanding. The public is well-indoctrinated with racial nihilist values, but not well-informed regarding the effects of racial nihilist policies, or the existence of possible alternatives. The combination of pervasive indoctrination with inertia and conformism, and the exclusion of possible alternatives from consideration by the mainstream media, maintains the culture on a racial nihilist course and permits the pace of racial destruction to be gradually increased, even if the fanaticism of the “true believer” is limited to a relative few. The few who are driven by a passionate intensity have more influence than the many who lack all conviction, who do not care, and who consign their race to oblivion with the deathstroke of indifference.

In the multiracial society, ideologically justified and supported by racial nihilism, the different races are denied their sense of racehood or racial identity, their organic connection to the continuum of life of which they and their own life is a part, from which it came and to which it belongs, the natural object of their loyalties and affections, their love and responsibilities. People are taught from childhood to neither value their race, nor have any love or care for it, or loyalty toward it. Such are the values instilled by racial nihilism, depriving the race of the love and loyalty of its members, so that its existence is not regarded as a value but is denied and violated. These are the genocidal values of racial destruction through alienation and disaffection of natural love and loyalty.

Racial conservation has much in common with the conservation of nature. The conservation and protection of nature and the natural environment depended on the development of a conservationist or environmentalist ethic, a system of morals and values that appreciated and recognized the importance of the natural environment and sought to preserve it. Racial preservation depends upon the development of a conservationist ethic for race, or human nature, similar to the conservationist ethic developed for non-human nature. It requires an ethic, a morality, of racial affirmation and conservation to replace the current ethic of racial denial and destruction, a morality with a positive view of race as a good to be appreciated, cherished, valued, loved and preserved rather than the current negative view of race as an evil to be discarded, rejected and destroyed. Such an ethic or morality is the essential foundation of the Racial Compact.



Postmodernism and Cultural Marxism


One of the key aspects of Cultural Marxism is Postmodernism:

Postmodernism is opposed to civilisation and in paticular Western civilisation, and it is opposed to any truth that society has accepted as absolute truth. That could be religious or moral truths that postmodernists disagree with, and seek to discredit and destroy in the long term (long march through the institutions) in order to remould thought and ‘human consciousness’ into anti Nation, anti religious, anti family, anti-gender and anti identity sentiments. This we can see everywhere.

It is closely assosiated with Marxist theory and is a very complicated term, it branches off into many directions but ultimately seeks the end of all standards, morals, traditions and truths that have become foundations of our civilisation, and what they consider to be a hierarchical domination over people and society.

Postmodernism sees the world emerging out of modernism ie the modern world, which gave birth to the rise of Western civilisation as an economic, cultural and technological power house. They believe that the pre and modern worlds gave rise to ‘oppressive’ economic and cultural ideas namely religion, Monarchy, capitalism and Patriotism. They see Western civilisation as one of war and suffering and never see it as the civilisation that brought so much to the world in science, technology, medicine, discovery, space exploration, art, music, etc. In fact the list literally is endless. The postmodernist sees the West as imperialist and speaks only of real or perceived Western wrong doings that every civilisation has been guilty of at some point in history, thier focus though is and always has been on the real or perceived wrong doings of Western civilisation.

A sense of loyalty and duty to ones Nation, culture, or religion, is seen as the people displaying these qualities being victims of circumstances, ie postmodernism believes that it is a system of values  they are born into, and have no choice in deciding for themselves. So anybody who is religious or patriotic are propping up this ‘oppressive’ society in the eyes of the postmodernist. To the postmodernist everything is a social construct, ie not real.

The modern world as they view it has come to an end, it has failed and they now pursue a post modern era free of all those cultural aspects and economic factors that built the most advanced and culturally strong continent on Earth.

In thier mindset the post modern world is a progression from the ‘fraud’ that is the modern world. They believe it to be a fraud because the major advances of the modern world are still ‘oppressive.’

We no longer should desire the teachings of religion as a moral foundation of society, or desire ‘hierarchical’ foundations such as the Nation or the family for example. Society, they say, is split into the haves and the have nots. Whites they say, and in particular White males are at the forefront of this ‘oppression’. The family, with the father as head of the family is a part of this ‘oppression’. Technological advances of the modern world are seen as dangerous and ‘oppressive’ ie advances in military technology, and this is where the anti war leftists are found. Anybody can be anti war but this particular strand is anti-Western and revolutionary in its aims.

Economically, they see capitalism as the rich getting richer and poor getting poorer, which is true to an extent in the case of internationalist super capitalism were big corporations and big central banks get rich off the backs of all of us. However postmodernism believes that White society and White males are guilty of this abuse of the average man and woman, therefore believing that only an end to White societies and cultures will ‘solve’ this problem. These are just some of the many postmodernist claims, and they substitute the real people behind this ie Jewish globalists, for a supposedly ‘white elite.’

The basic tenet of Postmodernism is that nothing is an absolute truth, as an example they would argue for example that the word of God is not an absolute truth, and through individual ‘freedom’ they should be able to decide for themselves what they believe to be true whether that ‘truth’ as they see it is ludicrous to wider society.

People are free to believe in God if they so wish, but Postmodernism does not acknowledge this as individual choice, but rather use this to pursue their revolutionary agenda.
The same applies to thier rebellious attitude towards the Nation, culture, tradition, the family and all foundations born out of the pre and modern worlds. They see them as outdated, and oppressive and see themselves as having an individual right, through rationality and human reason to reject cultural norms in favour of post modern ideas that are revolutionary and opposed to all forms of religion (Christianity in particular), patriotism, family values and the concepts of good and evil.

Postmodernism sees the world through an egalitarianist viewpoint.  Everything should be equal, and through deconstructing the ‘old’ with the ‘new’ this they believe will come about. This false idea manifests itself in many ways. The Nation and its cultural and ethnic identity will be eradicated in favour of a borderless world where eveybody is the same and ‘equal’.

This is pure fantasy as it has never, and will never be the case, that people will willingly give up thier National identity in favour of no identity, this is happening across the West only through stealthily subverting the people and particularly the youth through deceit and manipulation via institutions such as the media, entertainment industry and the education system.

This false egalitarianism extends to a much wider array of crackpot ideas such as wealth, gender roles and radical feminist ideas for example. Personal wealth and private property would be seized and redistributed among the collective group ie the community, which is communism by another name much like cultural marxism.

I do believe that the immoral wealth of Jewish globalist banks and privately owned globalist corporations are corrupt in the extreme, what I am opposed to is the ridiculous argument that White Western culture, morals traditions and standards are to blame. The postmodernists and the Cultural Marxists are the useful idiots of the globalist elite. They serve a purpose in playing a vitol role in the divide and conquer strategy, which is employed to achieve Jewish hegemony, globalism/Nwo and a world with no National boundries or cultural identity ie a global community enslaved by international finance. They dont see this and believe that they are ‘righteous’ when in reality they are furthering the agenda of those who also wish to see the end of Western civilisation and who also apparently oppose.

The traditional family environment is seen as a social construct by the postmodernists, they say there is no traditional family and that the family advances capitalism, again the same rhetoric as communism. The natural gender roles of the man and woman in raising a family are ridiculed, and described as old fashioned Christian enslavement of women and children believing that children are better raised and educated outside of the family environment. This is where radical feminism comes into play and the homosexual agenda.

Postmodernism suggests that the roles of the mother and father are ‘oppressive’ against women. They argue that homosexuality is as natural as heterosexualuality and is just as natural as the traditional family, because the traditional family is a social construct and ‘not real’.

Race is another area where postmodernism plays the social construct card, they deny the differences between the races and scream ‘racist’ at anybody who dares to highlight that fact. Just as they scream ‘racist’ at anybody who displays an ethnic and cultural awareness. To the Postmodernist, there is no such thing as diversity of mankind because in their opinion ‘difference is a social construction and we are all the same’.

So we can see how postmodernism and Cultural Marxism go hand in hand in terms of thier assault on the West. It is a very complex subject with no agreed upon definition but nevertheless, it runs through our education systems like blood runs through our veins. It is Marxist at its core and when applied into cultural terms becomes Cultural Marxism.

This is a very brief attempt at trying to explain how Postmodernism and Cultural Marxism are both sides of the same coin. The important thing to note is that postmodernism is at the root of Cultural Marxism as is critical theory.

Response for Cultural Marxists Part 2


Cultural Marxist:



WRONG: Recent gene surveys found that even in England, if you can trace your family back to being here pre-1950, your genetic make up is likely to be an average of 75% post ice age settler. In other words we are related to the people who came here first after the last great ice age. Indeed in Somerset the DNA of ‘Cheddar man’ was tested and it was found he was related to several people in the local area and one man nearby was directly related to him. 

Cultural Marxist:



The DNA survey has found that they do not account for more than 5% of our genetic make up. We have another 10% Germannic but that is over 10k years old so is a long way pre ‘dark age’ and probably from the time when the continent was linked to the UK and before the channel flooded. 

Cultural Marxist:



NO. Listen to yourself. You are so desperate to suggest that we are a nation of immigrants that you are saying that we are immigrants because (wait for it)… white Europeans ‘immigrated’ to… White Europe! Added to that, the English are a mix of Viking, Anglo-Saxon, ‘Celt’ and Norman. All white Europeans. The nation of England was not formed until the Viking and Anglo-Saxon invasions were complete. So the English cannot be immigrants as you cannot ‘immigrate’ to a country that does not yet exist. Same for the ‘British’. The Acts of Union were not passed until 1800 and 1801, so again, the British cannot ‘immigrate’ to a country that does not yet exist. Anybody who had family here before that cannot be an immigrant. 

Cultural Marxist:



WRONG. That theory died a death with the advent of DNA testing. We now know that white Caucasians and Cinasians originated in the Caucasus. Africans contain completely different DNA from as yet unknown hominids. They originated in West Africa. We are so genetically different that in any other life form we would be considered a separate species. 

Cultural Marxist:



WRONG. We are very different. And forgive me for mentioning, but don’t you keep telling us we should celebrate ‘diversity’? Now you are saying it does not exist! Nature favours diversity. It created races for a reason. The planned execution of racial mixing is an unnatural process. I am the champion of diversity. You want to destroy it. 

Cultural Marxist:



WRONG. Any geneticist or biologist will tell you, humans are a species (maybe more than one) and certainly not a race. 

Cultural Marxist:



Good. Explain why it is then that ‘equality’ means we are all the same, but ‘diversity’ means we are all different. ‘Equality and diversity’ is an oxymoron. You can have one OR the other. The two cannot exist together. When you chant your slogans, do you not think about what your are chanting? 

Cultural Marxist:

BUT THE VIKINGS AND ANGLO-SAXONS PROVE THAT IMMIGRATION IS NORMAL (He is trying to avoid dealing with the last VERY embarrassing point) 


WRONG. The Vikings, Anglo-Saxons and Normans were certainly not immigrants. Firstly we have already established that to be the case. Their culture and genetic make up was almost identical to the host population. So much so that they integrated immediately. Vikings and Anglo-Saxons even spoke the same (dialectically different) language. Vikings, Anglo Saxons and Normans were all recently historically related. Vikings were Anglo-Saxons that migrated north before crossing the North Sea. Normans were Vikings that then migrated to France before crossing the channel. Secondly, another reason they were not immigrants is that they were ‘invaders’ and openly acknowledged themselves as such. They did not come in, demand passports and get paid benefits. Immigration is not normal at all. Thirdly, as already established, Europeans do not ‘immigrate’ to Europe. Fourthly, immigration is not normal and has never been accepted as such. An example of this is QE1’s ‘Expulsion of the Blackamore’s’ Order. Yes in the Elizabethan period it was found that there may be ‘some’ (as many as ten!) ‘Blackamore’s’ (non white) people in the country. This caused alarm and the order was made for all to be expelled. Also have a quick read of Magna Carta. See what it says about foreigners. 

Cultural Marxist:



WRONG. Britain’s biggest cause of inbreeding birth defects is the immigrant population. Many immigrant communities carry out first cousin marriages. Island populations such as the UK, Japan and Iceland are classic examples of how island communities advance faster than those exposed to greater population movement. Iceland, Japan and the indigenous Britons before 1950 had the lowest birth defects per head of population in the world. The reason being that a population that marries between six and eighteen stations of it’s own immediate family actually produces less birth defects as it has the most compatible genes. Another example is the very high rate of birth defects in mixed race marriages. And it is also interesting that you are attempting to justify racial policies on the basis of eugenics. Aren’t you meant to be against eugenics? 

Cultural Marxist:


WOW…. Curry and Rap music. So even if you like either of both, are you suggesting that you have to import 6 million people in the space of a decade in order to get these ‘benefits’! So we can get the same ‘benefits’ if we import a cookbook and some CDs? Rather than a programme of mass immigration costing the taxpayer billions a year we could have asked a couple of holidaymakers to bring back a souvenir each. Using your flawed logic it would mean that we would not have been able to object to the  ‘German invasion’ in 1940 if people had realised we like lager and the occasional sausage….

Cultural Marxist:


All life came from the sea. Are you seriously suggesting that we should mate with fish? Perhaps you would like to adopt a shrimp, give it social housing and and pay it some benefits? Then indoctrinate your children about how they should feel guilty about the way aqua bottom feeders are only that way because of the ‘racism’ of the evil ‘white’ people.

Katyn – Another Covered up Communist Slaughter



The Katyn Massacre, also known as the Katyn Forest Massacre (Polish: zbrodnia katyńska, ‘Katyń crime’), was a mass murder of thousands Polish military officers, policemen, intellectuals and civilian prisoners of war by Soviet NKVD, based on a proposal from Lavrentiy Beria to execute all members the Polish Officer Corps dated March 5, 1940. This official document was then approved (signed) by the entire Soviet Politburo including Stalin and Beria. The number of victims is estimated at about 22,000, with the most commonly cited number of 21,768.

In 1943 German troops exhumated about 4100 corpses and put together a European commission consisting of twelve forensic experts and their staffs from Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark, Finland, France, Italy, Croatia, the Netherlands, Romania, Sweden, Slovakia, and Hungary. The committe checked the age of the corpses and the way that they were killed, and both proved, that the killings were done by the Soviets.

False accusations:

After the Soviets re-occupied the area, they did their best to show, that the killings were done by Germans. They also tried in Nuremberg to accuse the Germans, but even there, this was not successful.

After the war:

In Poland, the pro-Soviet authorities covered up the matter in accordance with the official Soviet propaganda line, deliberately censoring any sources that might provide information about the crime. Katyn was a forbidden topic in postwar Poland. Censorship in the People’s Republic of Poland was a massive undertaking and Katyn was specifically mentioned in the “Black Book of Censorship” used by the authorities to control the media and academia. Not only did government censorship suppress all references to it, but even mentioning the atrocity was dangerous. In the late 1970s, democracy groups like the Workers’ Defence Committee and the Flying University defied the censorship and discussed the massacre, in the face of beatings, arrests, detentions, and ostracism.

In 1981, Polish trade union Solidarity erected a memorial with the simple inscription “Katyn, 1940”. It was confiscated by the police and replaced with an official monument with the inscription: “To the Polish soldiers—victims of Hitlerite fascism—reposing in the soil of Katyn”. Nevertheless, every year on All Souls Day, similar memorial crosses were erected at Powązki cemetery and numerous other places in Poland, only to be dismantled by the police. Katyn remained a political taboo in communist Poland until the fall of communism in 1989.

– Metapedia

The Katyn Wood Massacre:

The first news of a massacre at Katyn Wood came in April 1943 when the Germans found a mass grave of 4,500 Polish soldiers in German-occupied Russia. The discovery at Katyn Wood was to greatly embarrass the Communist  government.

The Communists responded to the German claims that Russia’s secret police did it, by claiming that the massacre was carried out by the Germans themselves. In the context of the war – the Allies were fighting the German war machine and Russia was a ‘valued ally’ the German version was not accepted by the British or other Allied governments. However, in the era of the Cold War, the Russian version was heavily scrutinised and questionned.

The first announcement of what had been found at Katyn Wood was made on Radio Berlin on April 13th, 1943.

“A report has reached us from Smolensk to the effect that the local inhabitants have mentioned to the German authorities the existence of a place where mass executions have been carried out by the Bolsheviks and where 10,000 Polish officers have been murdered by the Soviet Secret State Police. The German authorities went to a place called the Hill of Goats, a Russian health resort situated twelve kilometers west of Smolensk, where a gruesome discovery was made.”
Radio Berlin broadcast.

The Germans found a ditch 28 meters long and 16 meters wide at the Hill of Goats in which were 3,000 bodies piled up in layers of twelve. All the bodies were fully dressed in military uniform; some were bound and all had pistol shots to the back of their heads. The Germans believed that they would find 10,000 bodies (hence the figure in the broadcast) but eventually the final total was 4,500. The Germans claimed that the bodies were in good condition and they even recognised a general Smorawinsky as one of the victims. The soil had done a great deal to preserve the bodies and any documentation found on them.

However, any information relating to this massacre made public during the war came from Goebbel’s propaganda ministry and was treated as suspect by the Allies. In January 1943, the Communists had turned the tide of the war with the defeat of the Germans at Stalingrad – a victory Churchill had urged all on the Allied side to celebrate. As if in a knee-jerk reaction, any criticism about the communists in Easter 1943 would not have been acceptable. Any connection between the massacre and the Germans, however, would have been more readily accepted by all those fighting against the Germans.

But what exactly did happen at Katyn Wood?

When German forces attacked Poland in September 1939 (due to the slaughter of ethnic Germans in Danzig a German territory), the Blitzkrieg tactic tore great holes in the Polish defence. However, on September 17th, as part of the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact, Russian forces also invaded Poland (there was no declaration of war against communist Russia by Britain or France). The communist leadership called on the Polish soldiers to rise up against their officers and political leaders as a punishment for getting the country into an unjust war. Those Polish officers and senior NCO’s captured by the Red Army were arrested and deported to Russia.

It is known that they were taken to three camps in Russia – Kozelsk, Starobelsk and Ostashkov. One of the camps, Kozelsk, contained more than just officers. It contained arrested Polish university lecturers, surgeons, physicians, barristers and lawyers. One woman prisoner was held at Kozelsk – Janina Lewandowski. Her body was found at Katyn clothed in the uniform of the Polish Air Force. Ostashkov held officers – but it also held anybody from Poland who was considered to be ‘bourgeois’. It seems that only Starobelsk held only officers from the Polish military.

To start with, the communists attempted to ‘re-educate’ the Poles in all three camps. Brigadier Zarubin of the Soviet Secret State Police was put in charge of this task. His efforts to promote the Soviet way of life probably had no chance. The Poles in the camp were forbidden to say Mass – which for a devout Roman Catholic nation was a major blow and it was almost certainly done secretly. Therefore, it is untenable to think that there were any takers for the Soviet view point which Zarubin was trying to sell. It seems that Zarubin reported his failure to Moscow and shortly after this a colonel from the Soviet Secret State Police turned up at all three camps. Just after the visit of this colonel, groups of prisoners were taken from the camps to an unknown destination.

In April 1940, all three camps were simultaneously cleared.

On June 22nd, 1941, Germany launched ‘Operation Barbarossa’. The German military swept aside the Russian army and penetrated deep into Russia. Stalin, alarmed by the collapse of the Red Army, ordered that an amnesty should be granted to all Polish prisoners who were willing to fight against the Germans. On August 14th 1941, a Polish-Soviet military agreement was signed. However, no-one could account for the whereabouts of the officers held in Kozelsk, Starobelsk and Ostashkov. Winston Churchill himself wrote about the embarrassment such a disclosure brought on the Russian authorities.

The Polish government in exile, based in London, was especially concerned that the Russians explain where these men were. Stalin gave two answers. Initially, he claimed that the men had escaped to Manchuria. However, the authorities in Moscow – which was effectively Stalin – claimed that the men were held in territory that the Germans had taken in their lightning attack in June 1941 and that only the Germans could account for their whereabouts. This was to become the standard Moscow answer to the problem – the Germans were responsible.

Locals at Katyn Forest had long known that it was an area used by the secret police to execute those who had fallen out with Stalin’s government. As early as 1929, the Soviet secret police had built a dacha there surrounded by barbed wire and armed guards. To keep out the locals, the secret police also used guard dogs to patrol the perimeter of the dacha.

On July 16th, 1941, Smolensk fell to the Germans. The Russian authorities had fled from Katyn and for the first time in years, the area was open ‘to the public’. In 1942, Poles from the Todt Organisation arrived in the area to collect any form of scrap. As they worked on the Hill of Goats, they found the body of a dead Polish officer who was later buried in a dignified service. However, the winter for 1942-43 was severe and the ground at the Hill of Goats was frozen over.  

In the Spring of 1943, a Russian peasant, Ivan Krivozertzev, read an article in a newspaper (‘Novyj Put’) regarding General Sikorski and his search for thousands of Polish officers whom he could not account for. Despite communism in Russia, Krivozertzev had maintained his religious beliefs and re-called what he had seen in Smolensk in 1940.

He had seen rail wagons coming into Smolensk station but being shunted into screened sidings. He had seen men being herded under armed guard into ‘Black Ravens’ – the local nickname for prison vehicles. Krivozertzev had also seen ‘normal’ prisoners being driven from Smolensk city in lorries with shovels and pick axes. Krivozertzev went to the Germans and told them that he believed the Polish officers would be found at the Hill of Goats. The Germans went to the forest and dug up mounds that had young fir trees on the top of them. These trees gave away an obvious secret as the rings on them indicated that they had been planted in April 1940.

The Germans started digging in the Hill of Goats and found the bodies of many men, still in military uniform, who had been shot in the back of the head with their hands tied behind their backs. The Germans also found the bodies of Russian men and women who had been shot long before 1940. Curiously, the Germans claimed that the way the Russians and Poles had been tied was identical and that whoever did both sets of murders was the same organisation. The 4,500 bodies that were exhumed came from Kozelsk – no-one knows what happened to the men held at Starobelsk and Ostashkov. Moscow announced its stance on April 14th 1943:

“The Polish prisoners in question were interned in the vicinity of Smolensk in special camps and were employed in road construction. In was impossible to evacuate them at the time of the approach of the German troops and, as a result, they fell into their hands. If, therefore, they have been found murdered, it means that they have been murdered by the Germans who, for reasons of provocation, now claim that the crime was committed by Soviet authorities.”

On April 15th, the British government publically stated via the BBC that the Germans had told lies and that it accepted the Communists version. This caused the Polish government in exile to call for an independent inspection of Katyn – something the International Red Cross in Switzerland could do. The German and Polish government (in exile) agreed to this; Moscow did not. The Russians broke off all relations with Poland and set up a puppet Polish government in Moscow.

When Russia advanced into Europe and re-captured Katyn, it seemed as if the issue was solved as it was clear that the Russians were not going to allow any investigation into what happened at Katyn. At the Nuremburg trials, the murders were linked to the indictment against Goering and the Russians presented their evidence to ‘prove’ it was the Germans, but they were never probed and Katyn drifted into obscurity. At the final judgment of the International Tribunal, Katyn was not even mentioned.

For their part the communists claimed that the massacre took place after it became obvious that the Wehrmacht was in full retreat after their defeat at Stalingrad and that it was carried out by the Germans. They put up the following evidence gathered at Nuremburg:

The Germans did not allow any external authority to fully examine either the bodies or the grave sites. The Polish Commission, set up by the Nazis to examine the evidence, was only allowed to see what the Germans wanted them to see. One Bulgarian professor, Marko Markov, claimed that he was only allowed to dissect one body that was presented to him and that he could not conclude from this body that it had been in the ground for three years – as the Nazis tried to suggest to him that it had been. In his written report, Markov only wrote about what he found on the body – he did not give a conclusion as to how the body got into its state.

He and seven other experts were only allowed two half-a-day visits to the grave sites by the Germans. “It reminded me of a tourist trip”, claimed Markov.

The Russians also claimed that the issue of the three year old saplings was also easy to explain. They claimed that there was no evidence that they came from the grave mounds themselves and that they could have been gathered at any point from Katyn Wood and handed in as ‘evidence’.

The communists also claimed that all the bullets found on the bodies were made by the German firm Geko. It was claimed that they were all Geko 7.65 mm bullets which only the German would have had access to.

Who committed the murders remained a mystery until 1990 when the Russian authorities admitted that it was the Russian Secret police (NKVD), that then spent much time and effort in attaching blame on the Germans.

The Entire Political Establishment in Britain is Unfit for Purpose


Rotherham Council has been described as “unfit for purpose” in a report commissioned by ‘Communities Secretary’ Eric Pickles. All council leaders have subsequently resigned as a result.

A bit of background information for those outside of the UK unaware of what happened in Rotherham. 1400+ young white girls were sexually abused by gangs of Pakistani Muslim men, the number of victims is rising by the hundreds as more and more people are coming forward. The local Labour council, social services and police force did nothing to deal with the problem, they exacerbated it with their total inability to deal with the industrial scale abuse of our nations young girls. The fear of being labeled ‘racist’ led to the police force ignoring the victims. That 6 letter word used so often to silence people, was responsible for an organisation employed to protect the people failing so badly in its duty to protect citizens. Shame on them.

The Labour run council also ignored the problem and covered it up, they refused to address the racial nature of the crimes being committed and allowed children to continue to be abused. These treacherous scum who support open borders mass immigration and multiculturalism, are every bit as responsible and guilty of these crimes as the perpetrators. As far as I am concerned they should be in the dock standing next to their ‘culture enriching’ chums. People who did highlight the racial nature of the grooming were sent on diversity training courses, you really couldn’t make it up. This is what Cultural Marxism creates, it is a scourge on society.

This isn’t a problem confined to Rotherham, this is a nationwide problem. In every town and city with a Muslim population there have been instances of child grooming, even in the university town of Oxford. It is a problem so vast that the victims must run into the tens of thousands across the country. It is a truly shocking betrayal of our nations young females and the whole political establishment is guilty, the antifa/uaf/swp traitors are to blame, the police are to blame and the social services are to blame. Every single council in this country are to blame, these Multiracialists who want to destroy our communities with their diversity deception have created a situation whereby our daughters are vulnerable in their own home towns and cities because of marauding foreigners grooming them for sexual abuse.

Over ten years ago, nationalists were exposing this mass abuse of our young girls at the hands of Pakistani grooming gangs, and they were labeled with the usual attack words of the Cultural Marxist left. The media set out to portray the truth as lies and racism, nationalists even ended up in court for daring to speak of the issues which years later were revealed to the nation as indisputable facts. They were attacked by the street thugs and useful idiots of financial democracy and globalism, ie the the far left attack dogs sponsored and funded by the government.

To think that in one town alone, 1400 young white working class girls have been victims of Muslim grooming gangs and that the police and local council ignored and covered it up for fear of being called racist. It is absolutely sickening and in many other nations the council buildings would now be nothing but smouldering ash. How dare these traitors allow this to happen to our children across this country. It is also staggering to think that an entire nation is so dumbed down and apathetic that that it becomes just another news story worthy of a grumble or two before they turn over to watch X factor.

Whilst Rotherham has been the centre of attention, the problem is much much bigger. The grooming has reached much farther than Rotherham. Never mind Rotherhams Labour council being “unfit for purpose,” the entire political establishment in Britain is unfit for purpose and is guilty of crimes against their own people. They should all be arrested and imprisoned for their purposeful cultural and demographic destruction of the nation. There is a general election coming up soon, and these same politicians and political party’s who created the conditions for this to happen, will be voted in again. It then becomes the guilt of the British people. Continuing to vote for these people is giving them your consent to continue doing what they have done with impunity for decades.

Multiculturalism is the problem:

It isn’t just the mass grooming that has taken place that is the problem.  It is multiculturalism as a whole that is the problem. How many of our nations men, women and children have been victims of the ‘culture enrichers?’ How many robberies? Rapes? Murders? Assaults? How many lives have been ruined by the diversity deception across the nation and across the Western world?

The mentally unstable left will claim that ‘all people commit crime’ and that ‘it has nothing to do with race or immigration.’ They are wrong, it has EVERYTHING to do with race and immigration. Yes indigenous British people commit crimes, but they are our problem to deal with and we have enough of them without importing the criminals from the rest of the world in some suicidal belief in a world with no borders with no races and cultures. Our men women and children should NEVER be in a situation where they face robbery, rape, murder or assault from anybody, even less a foreign born criminal. It is the worst kind of treachery.

These young white girls are victims of not only Muslim grooming gangs, but of politicians and left wing scum. They like all of us, have been betrayed and sold out to an agenda intent on our destruction as a nation and as a people.

It is time the British people turned off their televisions, and looked long and hard at what has been happening right under their noses for years. Your political establishment created the conditions for this to happen, so did your apathy, and so did the fifth columnists of the far left.

One day drastic change will sweep across Britain and Europe, and there will be no hiding place for TRAITORS.

Justice will be served.

Genocidal Kaufman and Hooton Plans for Germany, became the Reality for all of Western Europe


Since the end of WW2, the European continent and in particular Western European nations, have undergone a devastating demographic attack on an unprecedented scale that will lead to the indigenous European populations becoming minorities in the homelands of their ancestors by the end of this century.

What is the motivation for this demographic genocide of the European people? Why is it necessary to totally destroy beyond repair the racial and cultural makeup of an entire continent and race of people?

The answer can be seen in the disturbing plans for the genocide of the German people written by Theodore Kaufman (Jew) in a book called ‘Germany Must Perish’ written in 1940, a year before America entered the Second World War. And by Ernest Hooton in an article headlined “Breed War Strain Out of Germans.”

Read the following from Mark Weber:

‘A plan similar to Kaufman’s (Germany Must Perish) was issued during the war years by a prominent American anthropologist. In an article headlined “Breed War Strain Out of Germans” in the New York daily newspaper P.M., January 4, 1943, Ernest Hooton laid out an “outbreeding” plan that would “destroy German nationalism and aggressive ideology while retaining and perpetuating desirable German biological and sociological capacities.” (See also: Benjamin Colby, ‘Twas a Famous Victory, 1974, p. 131.)



The Harvard University professor’s proposal called for genetically transforming the German nation by encouraging mating of German women with non-German men, who would be brought into the country in large numbers, and of German men, forcibly held outside of Germany, with non-German women. Ten to twelve million German men would be assigned to forced labor under Allied supervision in countries outside of Germany to rebuild their economies. “The objects of this measure,” wrote Dr. Hooton, “include reduction of the birthrate of ‘pure’ Germans, neutralization of German aggressiveness by outbreeding and denationalization of indoctrinated individuals.”

This plan, Hooton estimated, would require at least 20 years to be implemented. “During this period,” he went on, “encourage also the immigration and settlement in the German states of non-German nationals, especially males.”

In the decades since the end of World War II, something of the spirit of the genocidal Kaufman and Hooton plans seems manifest in Germany’s population and immigration policies. Since the nation’s defeat in 1945, the German birth rate has fallen to below the replacement level, millions of racially and culturally alien migrants have been welcomed as settlers in Germany, the number of children of mixed ethnicity has sharply increased, and the ethniccultural character of much of the country has been drastically altered, especially in the larger cities.’

– Mark Weber


It doesn’t take much common sense and awareness to realise that this psychotic Jewish wish for the genocide of a whole nation of people is being played out not just against the Germans, but against all of Western Europe and America. Mass Immigration from non-European nations and the subsequent high birthrates of those populations within European nations, has drastically changed the racial and cultural make up of our major towns and cities. This has all been by design, and the motivation is to destroy the racial loyalty and racial consciousness of the European people who have historically been hostile to Jewish subversion of nations and cultures.

It wasn’t just German nationalism that the Jews feared and wanted to destroy. It was European nationalism, it was the European collective racial identity, that they wanted to destroy, the in-group identification that Europeans had within their own nations which kept them immune from Jewish infiltration.

The Jews fear and despise strong homogenous European nations, they hate our traditions, our heritage, history and people, they hate Europeans identifying as Europeans and understanding their specific interests as Europeans. They see the European people as their biggest nemesis, because historically the European has not stood for this Jewish attack on his way of life.

Let us not forget that these people have been kicked out of 100+ European nations throughout history for the very same reasons as what they are doing today, ie a hostile out-group intent on subverting nations and cultures from within in order to control and destroy them making them less of a threat to Jewish hegemony.

This reality of course is always called anti-semitism, Jewish behaviour is never acknowledged as the reason for hostility towards Jewish people in the West. The blame is always put on the ‘evil European’ and his ‘inherent anti-semitic racism.’

Jewish intellectuals tried to explain this by saying that the traditional family structure was a precursor to anti-semitism, they said that the ‘Authoritarian Personality’ created the necessary conditions for fascism and anti-semitism to rise. This psudeo-scientific nonsense was never projected onto the Jewish community or the Jewish family, it was the European Christian family that was the target of the false science that was designed to pathologise an entire group who were hostile to Jews as a subversive and hostile out-group. This false science was simply a method of psychological and ethnic warfare against the European people which sadly many have fallen for.

Germany, which had seen the decadence of a Jewish dominated culture (Weimar), had rid itself of the cancerous cells that had poisoned their society from within. They regained control over their cultural institutions, their media, film and publishing houses. The Germans kicked out the Jewish bankers who were plundering the nation whilst the German people were starving in the aftermath of WW1 and the intentionally crippling Versailles Treaty. The Jews had been sussed out, and German nationalism no longer let them dictate and destroy the German nation.

The tone of ‘Germany Must Perish’ is that of somebody representing a particular group (Jews), and who is trying to convince the world through non-stop propaganda and lies, that the German people were a blood thirsty, war crazed people, who would never stop ‘waging war’ until they and the German nation were destroyed, ‘not just in fancy, but in fact.’

The reason for this narrative is obvious, the Jewish author and the group he represented wanted to whip up anti-German hysteria for the time when America entered the war. They wanted to justify in the minds of the masses that the genocide of the German people was something vital and necessary for the long term peace and stability of mankind. In reality however, the Jews simply wanted to paint their enemy in as bad a light as possible so that any and all measures to defeat them were on the table, and all measures were on the table to prevent them from ever rising up again, including sterilisation and genocide.

Never were the considerations of Germans mentioned, never were the very real reasons for anti-Jewish feelings mentioned. You would think that Germany had just decided one day to turn on the Jews and regain control of their country for no reasons whatsoever. The Jews such as Kaufman would have you believe that the German people were inherently lustful for war and had no reasons to be very critical of and hostile to the Jews.

Theodore Kaufman, was a Jewish extremist, he spoke about war and aggression being ‘in the heart and soul of the German nation.’ He attempted to portray himself as speaking as an American, however if you are Jew wise, you know that in this book he was speaking as a Jew, and was trying to stir up anti-German hatred. He also spoke of the American soldier being promised that he would would never have to fight another war against Germany ever again. He called them ‘our soldiers’ as if he was really concerned about a single American soldier. Kaufman’s concerns were Jewish concerns not American concerns or that of Europeans.

When we look at the Western world today, then what the Germans were being portrayed as before, during, and after WW2 by the Jews, we are all being portrayed as now, as white Europeans. The Germans were labeled as an aggressive warmongering people who needed to be destroyed, and white Europeans collectively today are labeled as ‘racist imperialists’ ‘anti-semites,’ ‘fascists and nazis’ (their image), who have committed crime after crime against humanity and therefore need to be destroyed via mass immigration and miscegenation. Read ‘Germany Must Perish’ or Ernest Hooton’ plans for Germany and you will realise how familiar that rhetoric sounds.

Weimar decadence has come to the West as a result of the same culture destroying group who brought it to 1920s Germany. Mass Immigration has been brought to you by the same people, hate laws to shut you up have been enshrined into law at the behest of the same group. We could go on and on. What they had done to Germany they are doing to us all today, Germany just had the nerve to stand up to them. As a result Germany has never been the same due to the alliance of the capitalist and communist power houses who combined to destroy the German nation and people. The German nation, like other European nations, are virtually destroyed today. Is that our prize as Europeans for killing tens of millions of our own racial brothers and sisters in a war that was not in the European interest but which was in the interest of international Jewry?

‘Germany Must Perish’ could now quite easily be ‘Europe Must Perish.’ It is the same idea, what they wanted to do to Germany is what they have done to us all. Kaufman said that for war to end forever, certain punishments had to be meted out, ie the total destruction of Germany, he said that ‘a great scourge would be removed from the world’ and that a ‘greater good’ would come of it. This is the same language that is used by Jews and progressives today. They say that for ‘racism’ to be destroyed, the white race has to be destroyed and that a greater good will come from a world without whites as a majority in their own homelands.

At that specific time in history, it was Germany who had risen and removed the Jews from the influential positions they held during the Weimar period. The Jews having been made well aware that their dominance in Germany was over, sought to use their influence in other nations to create a World War in which Germany was to be destroyed forever by the forces of Jewish Capitalism and Jewish Communism. The methods which were being spoken about to destroy Germany forever, ie through mass immigration of non-German men into Germany to mix with German women, and thereby ‘breeding out the war strain and the race’ is something I think they decided was necessary for all of Europe which they view as the only real potential obstacle to their goal of world dominance. It would be a startling coincidence if the Kaufman and Hooton plans for Germany had not played a role in the Europe you see today.

The European people in 2015 as a whole, are the 1945 German, Europe in 2015 today represents the vision they had for Germany in the late 1930s and 40s. Ernest Hooton laid out an “outbreeding” plan that would “destroy German nationalism,” does the same not apply to Europe today and Western civilisation as a whole? Is it just a coincidence? I think not.

The mass promotion of miscegenation is not just a coincidence, the opening of our borders to Africa and Asia is not a coincidence, the constant negative and weak stereotype of the white male in advertising media and film is not a coincidence, the growing mixed race population is not a coincidence. They were already speaking of doing this to Germany years before our borders were opened.

There are quotes from influential Jews who boast about what they have done.

Earl Raab, executive director emeritus of the Perlmutter Institute of Jewish Advocacy, an associate of the ADL (Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith) and writer for the San Francisco Jewish Bulletin, wrote:

“It was only after World War II that immigration law was drastically changed to eliminate such discrimination. In one of the first pieces of evidence of its political coming-of-age, the Jewish community has a leadership role in effecting those changes.”

Raab goes on to celebrate the coming minority status of Whites in America. Once that has happened, he looks forward to “constitutional constraints” (restriction of freedom of speech?):

“The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.”

“We have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to ethnic bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever.”

Is it just a coincidence that the driving force behind the 1965 Open Immigration Act in America were powerful Jewish groups who had been campaigning to have the borders opened for decades?

Is it just a coincidence that wherever there is a white majority population on this Earth, they are being chased down by the diversity deception with genocidal intent? America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand along with the Western European nations are all being targeted for demographic terrorism by this hostile Jewish out-group who constitute a very powerful and influential minority in our nations.

If a book such as ‘Germany Must Perish’ existed today written by a European about Jews, then it would be banned such is the psychotic hatred found within it. The author would no doubt be incarcerated and branded as some kind of mentally unstable neo-nazi Jew hating anti-semite. To write a book about destroying the German nation and people, and to talk about sterilising them however, is not seen as something that should be criticised. The book was an incitement to commit genocide and if you look at Germany today, and many other Western European nations, then the words that were written in that book are being played out across the white world today.

Read Germany Must Perish here and see for yourself the pathological Jewish hatred of the German people who had dared to take control of their country and right the wrongs of the Versailles Treaty.


In 1944 another book was written which advocated the mass psychological brainwashing of the German people. It was called ‘What to do with Germany’ and was written by Louis Nizer.


Nizer was a wealthy Jewish lawyer from New York and was also a colleague of Theodore Kaufmann and Henry Morgenthau, FDR’s Secretary of the Treasury and the author of the Morgenthau Plan. Nizer was in favour of absolute brainwashing of the German people, turning them into conformative Zombies if you like.

Read the following from the official DIRECTIVES FOR RE-EDUCATION of 1945:

“Re-education will be compulsory for young and old alike, and must not be restricted to the classroom.
We should employ the great power of conviction that goes with dramatic presentation in its service – movies can be used to greatest effect here.

We should employ the greatest authors, producers and stars under the auspices of an “International University” to dramatize the limitless evils of Nazism, and contrast these evils with the simple beauty of a Germany that is no longer obsessed with marching and shooting.

These movies will have the mission of creating an appealing picture of democracy.

In addition, radio broadcasts will be used to penetrate German homes with formal lectures and informal discussions.

German authors, dramatists and publishers should be subjected to constant examination through this “International University” as well, since they are all educators.
Undemocratic publications must of course be suppressed from the beginning.

Only after German thinking has been strengthened in the new democratic ideals should we allow opposing views, when we are confident that the Nazi virus has been eliminated. This way, we will gain immunity for the future.

The re-education process must penetrate all of German society.
During their leisure time, the working classes should also receive simple lessons in democracy. Summer outings and popular educational events can help accomplish this.

Many German prisoners of war will remain in Russia after the war is over – not voluntarily, of course, but because Russia needs their labor.
This is completely legal and it lessens the danger that returning prisoners might form the nucleus of a new national movement.
Even if we do not wish to keep German prisoners after the War, we should send them to Russia.

The “International University” provides the best vehicle for monitoring and controlling the details of the German educational system, including schools, lesson plans, selection of teachers and textbooks – in short, all pedagogical institutions and materials.
In addition, we need a “High Command” for our re-education offensive.

Particularly gifted German students should be given opportunity to further their education in our schools; they should then return to Germany as teachers and found a new democratic tradition that combines a sense of international citizenship.

Whenever possible, their professors should be liberal and democratic. The intervention of “foreigners” could have an agitating effect and it must be kept to a minimum, but should not cause us to lose control.

Every imaginable kind of democratic influence should be employed in the service of re-education. This calls for the efforts of churches, movies, theatre and radio as well as the press and labor unions.

Re-education should take the place of military service.
Every German should be required to participate, just as they were formerly conscripted.

The task has fallen to us of protecting world peace and freedom.

This is the freedom that was born on Mount Sinai, lay in its cradle in Bethlehem, spent its early youth in England and whose stern schoolmaster was France.
It is the freedom that spent its early manhood in the United States, the freedom that is destined to spread all over the world – if we do our duty.”

The above ‘directives’ could quite easily be applied to the West today, an ‘international university’ brainwashing the people of the West to embrace their own genocide.

A letter published by the Miami News, 12th July 1938, entitled ‘Kill off the Germans’ stated that:

“Nothing but almost complete extermination of the savage
whites will insure peace on earth and goodwill toward men.”


In September 1944 a French clergyman announced from the pulpit:

“What remains to be done is to kill every German.”

“There must be no distinction between soldiers and civilians in the destruction of men, women and children.”

The congregation applauded.


These Genocidal ideas which have today been put into practice for whites everywhere, have been long in the planning. Whites who identify as whites and who have loyalty to their Race and Nation are the primary foe of the Jews because whites who are loyal to Race and Nation, do not conform to the Jewish agenda that dominates and subverts the Race and Nation from within and therefore are an obstacle to these aims that must be removed, destroyed via mass immigration, miscegenation and Cultural Marxism.

If we look at the declining white birth rate, then this can be seen as a form of sterilisation of the European people. The promotion of feminism and the career over family mindset promoted by Jewish feminists has had a decimating impact upon the white family. The incessant Jewish led promotion of mixing the races has also had a major impact on the white birth rate.

White Europeans have been led to believe that Mass Immigration of third world people into their homelands was something that could not be stopped, that it was natural population movement, that it was evolution. Most Europeans fell for those lies, and they fell for the deceptions that told them they were being enriched, that race was a social construct, that we are all immigrants etc. All of these lies were concocted by Jewish academics and pushed by their useful idiot Gentile lackeys who couldn’t see that they were being played and used to advance specifically Jewish interests.

Unless Europeans wake up to these facts, and soon, then the genocidal tendencies of these people will become reality.

Mass Immigration is the Jewish signed Death Warrant of the European people.

The Four Stages of Ideological Subversion, How to Brainwash a Nation


By Yuri Bezmenov KGB defector.

Stage 1 — Demoralization

The demoralization process in the United States is basically completed already, for the last twenty-five years, actually it’s over-fulfilled because demoralization now reaches such areas where previously not even Comrade Andropov and all his experts would even dream of such a tremendous success, most of it is done by Americans to Americans, thanks to lack of moral standards. As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to access true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I showered him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures — even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him a concentration camp — he will refuse to believe it until he is going to receive a kick in his fat bottom. When a military boot crashes his butt, then he will understand, but not before that. That’s the tragedy of the situation of demoralization.

Stage 2 — Destabilization

The next stage is destabilization. This time the subverter does not care about your ideas and the patterns of your consumption, whether you eat junk food and get fat and flabby doesn’t matter anymore. This time — and it takes only from two to five years to destabilize a nation — what matters is essentials. Economy, foreign relations, defense systems. And you can see quite clearly that in some areas, in such sensitive areas as defense and economy, the influence of Marxist-Leninist ideas in the United States is absolutely fantastic. I could never believe it fourteen years ago when I landed in this part of the world that the process would go that fast.

Stage 3 — Crisis

The next stage of course is crisis, it may take only up to six weeks to bring a country to the verge of crisis, you can see it in Central America now. And after crisis, with a violent change of power, structure, and economy, you have a so-called period of normalization. It may last indefinitely.

Stage 4 — Normalization

Normalization is a cynical expression, borrowed from Soviet propaganda, when the Soviet tanks moved into Czechoslovakia in 1968, Comrade Brezhnev said, “Now the situation in brotherly Czechoslovakia is normalized.”

This is what will happen in the United States if you allow all the schmucks to bring the country to crisis. To promise people all kinds of goodies and a paradise on Earth. To destabilize your economy. To eliminate the principle of free market competition and to put a Big Brother government in Washington DC with benevolent dictators like Walter Mondale who will promise lots of things, never mind whether the promises are fulfilled or not. He will go to Moscow to kiss the bottoms of a new generation of Soviet assassins, never mind, he will create false illusions that the situation is under control.

The situation is not under control. The situation is disgustingly out of control. Most of the American politicians, media, and educational system, trains another generation of people who think they are living at the peace time. False. The United States is in a state of war. Undeclared total war against the basic principles and the foundations of this system. And the initiator of this war is not Comrade Andropov of course, it’s the system — however ridiculous it may sound — the world Communist system, or the world Communist conspiracy. Whether I scare some people or not I don’t give a hoot. If you are not scared by now, nothing can scare you. But you don’t have to be paranoid about it. What actually happens now, that unlike myself, you have literally several years to limp on unless the United States wakes up. The time bomb is ticking, with every second the disaster is coming closer and closer, unlike myself you will have no where to defect to. Unless you want to live in Antarctica with penguins. This is it, this is the last country of freedom and possibility.

How to Bring Down a Nation


If you were intent on bringing down a powerful rival whose philosophy, as originally founded, was strong, independent and entirely opposite from your own a country that you would not want to confront militarily how would you go about it?  The answer is simple; orchestrate the society’s destruction from within.

Although possibly taking longer than a military victory and requiring great patience, the damage would be just as effective if not more so.  When you destroy from within, you do it by using that country’s own people, no blood is spilled in combat and the physical infrastructure is left intact.

In any country, there are but a few key areas that determine how the citizens mature, live, and develop their beliefs.  These are the focal points that must be attacked.  In his book, On War, Clausewitz referred to this concept of identifying and then focusing on select points as attacking the center of gravity. 

The center of gravity is that key element, if controlled or destroyed, would most hurt your opponent and is the critical factor in achieving your objective.  In this case, when taking control of or destroying a country from within, the key is to attack and control the mind of the inhabitants you must shape the way people view life and the values upon which their life is based.  Shape the mind and you control their direction.  Control their direction and you can lead them down a pathway to hell.

The centers of gravity I would shape in orchestrating a country’s downfall from within are its perception of truth, its future generations, the political philosophy, its sense of nationalism and of course, the economy.

To shape truth, control the media: 

Most people absorb what they know about life from the major media centers these days.  The media paints the picture for all to see.  If that picture is constantly distorted, lies become accepted as truth, i.e. tell enough lies repeatedly and soon those lies are accepted as fact.   Spin and concoct, distort and influence using the public platforms such as television, radio and print and you can influence, sway and control the mind of the vast majority of its population in any area you choose.  This subversive influence includes pitting one group against another in order to foment internal discord as well as ridiculing, discrediting and challenging moral principles and national values in order to destroy any hint of a strong spiritual foundation or allegiance to a unique national culture.  This is a much easier task if many in your target audience have become lazy, ill-educated, ill-informed, unthinking and apathetic.

To shape future generations, control the schools:

Incrementally indoctrinate the children with principles that are sympathetic to your philosophy.  Make future generations weak in mind, body and spirit. Avoid teaching children the basic facts about their own history, constitution or rights. Teach them that natural aggression is wrong and docile submission is right. Teach them that any basis of a moral foundation, like the principles of religion, is a weakness to be avoided in the name of freedom and also redefine the concept of patriotism to support your views. Teach them to cast off old values and traditions in the interest and name of sensitivity after all, we wouldn’t want to offend anyone with our old fashioned or traditional beliefs now would we?  And guns, guns are wicked, dangerous, and socially unacceptable an evil that must be eradicated from society for the good of the children of course.

To shape the political philosophy, infiltrate the government: 

Whenever and wherever possible place those sympathetic to your philosophy into office at all levels the higher, the better so they can sway the direction of the country within every function of government, promising solutions, handouts and benefits for all.  In such a way you can tilt legislation toward incrementally increasing the control of and dependency on government a government that you are shaping.  Concurrently, if you can pack the courts with appointed judges who will not hold you accountable to the law and its constitution, you can act with virtual impunity. Infiltration at the highest levels can also be employed to weaken the military through budget cuts, unwarranted restrictions and over commitment, degrading both force morale and effectiveness. A country without a strong military is like a bull without horns or a tiger without claws defenseless and vulnerable.

To shape the sense of nationalism, dilute the culture and the language: 

A strong society has at its foundation a unique culture and a common language. Simply put, it is the culture and language which ultimately defines and unites a nation.  If you can manipulate these two critical elements through legislative action and social pressure, you can weaken the foundation of any country. How?  Introduce and eventually force the acceptance of a multi-cultural concept and refuse to accept a common tongue as the official language. In short, prevent cultural assimilation and undermine any sense of nationalism. Encourage and orchestrate a mosaic society rather than a ‘melting pot’ and you will eventually mortally wound the national fabric.  


This is a good summary of how a nation can be destroyed from within. It describes concisely the methods that are implemented to undermine a nation and its culture. One criticism I have is that I dont subscribe to the notion of ‘assimilation.’ In the Western world we live in now, any ideas of assimilation are just further facilitating cultural destruction. Whether it be forced multi-culturalism or forced assimilation it is all severely damaging to our own unique cultural and ethnic identity. We have had no say in whether we wanted multiculturalism or whether we wanted to assimilate other cultures and people into our nations. We have been told that this is how it is to be, we have been forced to ‘accept’ what has been done. We were never going to get the choice, because the Western world would have rejected it so it had to be imposed.

The outcome of forced multiculturalism is always conflict, the outcome of assimilation is always the weakening and disappearance of the host culture and people.



The Statue of Liberty, a false beacon for Mass Immigration



A brief excerpt from Wikipedia on the Statue:

The Statue of Liberty (Liberty Enlightening the World; French: La Liberté éclairant le monde) is a colossal neoclassical sculpture on Liberty Island in the middle of New York Harbor, in Manhattan, New York City. The statue, designed by Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi and dedicated on October 28, 1886, was a gift to the United States from the people of France. The statue is of a robed female figure representing Libertas, the Roman goddess of freedom, who bears a torch and a tabula ansata (a tablet evoking the law) upon which is inscribed the date of the American Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776. A broken chain lies at her feet. The statue is an icon of freedom and of the United States: a welcoming signal to immigrants arriving from abroad.

This last sentence is worth paying more attention too, the Statue of Liberty was not supposed to be a “welcoming signal to immigrants arriving from abroad.” This false idea is what the Statue has falsely come to represent, ie that America supposedly welcomes ALL immigrants.

When the Statue of Liberty was dedicated on October 28, 1886, the ceremonial speeches had nothing to do with immigrants arriving in America. And the sculptor who created the enormous statue, Fredric-Auguste Bartholdi, did not connect the statue with immigration. The whole myth surrounding the Statue and immigration arises from a poem written in 1883 called the ‘New Colossus’ written by Emma Lazarus, a Jewish immigrant.

In 1901, Lazarus’s friend Georgina Schuyler began an effort to memorialize Lazarus and her poem, which succeeded in 1903 when a plaque bearing the text of the poem was mounted on the inner wall of the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty.

The poem, which is emblazoned on a plaque inside the Statue has the following words:

“Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
“Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she
With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

The original manuscript is held by the American Jewish Historical Society.

This poem has come to falsely represent the myth that America is a nation that should open its arms to the world and its people, and that the once 90% European majority who built America, should not oppose it.

Drew Smith, an elderly New Orleans attorney who had authored ‘The Legacy of the Melting Pot’, once said:

“Whose interest could have been served in having America flooded with ‘wretched refuse’? It was in the perceived interest of a cohesive people who use racial solidarity like a weapon, a weapon they want only for themselves. The efforts to change the American immigration law and ultimately displace the European majority has been led almost exclusively by Jews.”

Emma Lazarus was typical of your diaspora Jew, she advocated and pushed for ‘racial diversity’ in America as they do across the West, but who also wanted an exclusively Jewish state in Palestine for Jews.

‘The beautiful jade-colored colossus (Statue of Liberty) had no original connection with immigration and predated the Ellis Island immigration center. It was a gift from France to commemorate the American Revolution, not to honor the arrival of “wretched refuse” on America’s shores. It is instructive to note that this beautiful statue of European Womanhood faces not to Africa, Asia or South America, but the land where she was born, France and Europe itself.’