The Gay Manifesto and the ‘Satire’ Deception

Before this blog is read, it is important to know that there is an opening part to this ‘manifesto’ that describes it as a ‘satirical piece.’ The radical homosexual agenda clings to this as ‘proof’ that a homosexual agenda doesn’t exist. After reading through the ‘manifesto’ we will deal with this omitted ‘disclaimer.’

The Gay Manifesto:

This is the ‘Gay Manifesto’ published by Michael Swift first published in Gay Community News, February 15th to the 21st in 1987. It is also printed in the Congressional Record. This is what it states:

First Published in Gay Community News, February 15-21, 1987.

We shall sodomise your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us.

Women, you cry for freedom. You say you are no longer satisfied with men; they make you unhappy. We, connoisseurs of the masculine face, the masculine physique, shall take your men from you then. We will amuse them; we will instruct them; we will embrace them when they weep. Women, you say you wish to live with each other instead of with men. Then go and be with each other. We shall give your men pleasures they have never known because we are foremost men too, and only one man knows how to truly please another man; only one man can understand the depth and feeling, the mind and body of another man.

All laws banning homosexual activity will be revoked. Instead, legislation shall be passed which engenders love between men.
All homosexuals must stand together as brothers; we must be united artistically, philosophically, socially, politically and financially. We will triumph only when we present a common face to the vicious heterosexual enemy.

If you dare to cry faggot, fairy, queer, at us, we will stab you in your cowardly hearts and defile your dead, puny bodies.

We shall write poems of the love between men; we shall stage plays in which man openly caresses man; we shall make films about the love between heroic men which will replace the cheap, superficial, sentimental, insipid, juvenile, heterosexual infatuations presently dominating your cinema screens. We shall sculpt statues of beautiful young men, of bold athletes which will be placed in your parks, your squares, your plazas. The museums of the world will be filled only with paintings of graceful, naked lads.
Our writers and artists will make love between men fashionable and de rigueur, and we will succeed because we are adept at setting styles. We will eliminate heterosexual liaisons through usage of the devices of wit and ridicule, devices which we are skilled in employing.

We will unmask the powerful homosexuals who masquerade as heterosexuals. You will be shocked and frightened when you find that your presidents and their sons, your industrialists, your senators, your mayors, your generals, your athletes, your film stars, your television personalities, your civic leaders, your priests are not the safe, familiar, bourgeois, heterosexual figures you assumed them to be. We are everywhere; we have infiltrated your ranks. Be careful when you speak of homosexuals because we are always among you; we may be sitting across the desk from you; we may be sleeping in the same bed with you.

There will be no compromises. We are not middle-class weaklings. Highly intelligent, we are the natural aristocrats of the human race, and steely-minded aristocrats never settle for less. Those who oppose us will be exiled.

We shall raise vast private armies, as Mishima did, to defeat you. We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual love and honor are invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers.

The family unit-spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy and violence – will be abolished. The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will, must be eliminated. Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in the genetic laboratory. They will be bonded together in communal setting, under the control and instruction of homosexual savants.
All churches who condemn us will be closed. Our only gods are handsome young men. We adhere to a cult of beauty, moral and esthetic. All that is ugly and vulgar and banal will be annihilated. Since we are alienated from middle-class heterosexual conventions, we are free to live our lives according to the dictates of the pure imagination. For us too much is not enough.
The exquisite society to emerge will be governed by an elite comprised of gay poets. One of the major requirements for a position of power in the new society of homoeroticism will be indulgence in the Greek passion. Any man contaminated with heterosexual lust will be automatically barred from a position of influence. All males who insist on remaining stupidly heterosexual will be tried in homosexual courts of justice and will become invisible men.

We shall rewrite history, history filled and debased with your heterosexual lies and distortions. We shall portray the homosexuality of the great leaders and thinkers who have shaped the world. We will demonstrate that homosexuality and intelligence and imagination are inextricably linked, and that homosexuality is a requirement for true nobility, true beauty in a man.
We shall be victorious because we are fueled with the ferocious bitterness of the oppressed who have been forced to play seemingly bit parts in your dumb, heterosexual shows throughout the ages. We too are capable of firing guns and manning the barricades of the ultimate revolution.

Tremble, hetero swine, when we appear before you without our masks.

The ‘satire’ claim;

“This essay is an outré, madness, a tragic, cruel fantasy, an eruption of inner rage on how the oppressed desperately dream of being the oppressor.”

The claim that this is satirical is as weak as it is pathetic, by simply reading through the ‘manifesto’ you can see that a large part of what is claimed to be satire has in fact come true. Are we supposed to believe that, Micheal Swift, who wrote this, did so in a satirical manner just because he said so? In one sentence? One insignificant sentence compared to the content of the rest of the hate filled manifesto?

Unfortunately for the radical homosexual extremists, not all people are so stupid and so gullible as to fall for the ‘satire’ claim. If a manifesto had been written by a white nationalist for example, along the same lines but with different content, and with equally as blunt wording. And who had, with one sentence claimed it to be satire, do you really think anybody would believe his claim? Or would the individual have been imprisoned and held up for the world to see as a ‘dangerous neo-nazi with fantasies of race war and murder.’ Would the manifesto not be presented widely as an insight into the mind of a ‘racist.’ Would the satire claim even be considered? Of course not, but because a homosexual calls it satire, we are all supposed to believe that, like good little heterosexual sheep.

When reading through the manifesto, do you really see it as a group of ‘oppressed’ homosexuals ‘just having a laugh’ or do you find the content disturbing?

Lets look at the satire claim again bit by bit.

“This essay is an outré, madness, a tragic, cruel fantasy, an eruption of inner rage on how the oppressed desperately dream of being the oppressor.”

A fantasy is defined as;

• The faculty or activity of imagining impossible or improbable things:

• A fanciful mental image, typically one on which a person often dwells and which reflects their conscious or unconscious wishes.

Just because something is perceived as ‘improbable’ does not mean that it is necessarily ‘impossible.’ If I have a fantasy about flying to the moon with my own wings, then that would be an impossible fantasy. If I had a fantasy that one day i was mega rich, it may be improbable, but never impossible.

‘Something that an individual often dwells on and which reflects their conscious or unconscious wishes,’ this doesn’t mean that the author doesn’t want what is stated in the manifesto to happen. It means he may want it to happen, and despite it being considered improbable, is a dream that to him is not necessarily impossible.

‘An eruption of inner rage’ there is nothing satirical about that statement, the author is stating his inner feelings of rage towards heterosexuals and the nuclear family.

‘On how the oppressed desperately dream of being the oppressor.’

Again, where is the satire? I don’t see any whatsoever. The author is stating that in his ‘ideal world’ ie ‘desperately dreaming’ he would like to see homosexuals oppress the natural normality of heterosexuality which produces children and creates families in the natural heterosexual enviroment, this is something they are trying desperately to undermine and remould to suit their own image.  Just because somebody claims this sentence shows that the manifesto is ‘not to be taken seriously’ it doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t take it seriously, and it doesn’t mean that the author didn’t put that in to deflect attention away from what he, and other radical homosexuals ‘dream of.’

Nobody is suggesting that an armed army of homosexuals in pink combat fatigues is set to roll through the streets in pink tanks with a multitude of pink fighter jets above, but it certainly wouldn’t be far fetched to see radical homosexuals and their enablers join an armed revolution at some point in the future would it?

The majority of the manifesto is a genuine display of homosexual hatred of the family and heterosexuality, if a heterosexual had written this and reversed the roles, then it would be regarded as an extremist publication, and cause for arrest. Most of what is written in it has come to pass, although it would never be presented in the manner the manifesto is written.

The radical and militant homosexual agenda understands well the concept of mass deception.