We have posted once or twice lately about the Jewish supremacist nature of the Neoconservative movement in America. And it is important for people to understand who they are, where they came from and how they ended up controlling US and to a large extent Western foreign policy which has resulted in wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and the destabilising of Syria and more recently the Ukraine.
The Neoconservative movement present themselves as the pursuers of ‘freedom and democracy’ but are nothing more than warmongers and puppeteers. They are predominantly Jewish, heavily pro Israel Zionists, and rather than pursuing the supposed foreign policy of the US, they are pursuing the foreign policy of Israel, Jewish international finance and Jewish globalism. The accusation of dual loyalty between America and Israel has been used against them, which they deny, saying that first and foremost they are American. This is I believe is not true, if anything, i would say that their only loyalty is to Israel and world Jewry, and through their control of the Federal Reserve, media, Hollywood and politics in America, they are using the American people, military and financial resources to do what is in the best interests of Israel and the Jews and not America and its people.
America in the 21st century has come to be a nation despised around the world for their perceived Imperialism and constant drumbeat of the threat of war. Nations are dragged through the media and presented as evil and dictatorial and pressure is put on them. It began with the lies about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, then Libya and Gaddafi were targeted, then Syria and Iran. The claim that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction was false, and the so called intelligence came from Israel. A war was fought and many many thousands of men women and children died as a result. In the Neoconservative minds it was a job ‘well done’ and on to the next one. In Syria, the claim was that the Assad government used chemical weapons against his own people, this was shown to be a false claim but nevertheless the Neocons pursued military action only to be thwarted by Russia. Again it was Israeli intelligence that suggested the use of chemical weapons. The media which is over 90% Jewish owned which they themselves admit, works hand in hand with the Jews who work behind the scenes dictating American and Western foreign policy.
So who are the Neoconservatives?
I want to share with you an excerpt from Dr David Dukes book ‘Secret Behind Communism’.
The Communist Origins of Neoconservatism: Chapter 31.
The “neo-conservative” movement, the lobby group directly responsible for the illegal, immoral and disastrous war in Iraq of 2003, is entirely misnamed. They are not “conservatives” in any sense of the word, and the entire ideology is essentially an extension of Jewish Trotskyism, as evidenced in their own words.
An article by the Neoconservative “godfather” Irving Kristol in the Weekly Standard in 2003 summed up the situation:
“The historical task and political purpose of neo-conservatism would seem to be this: to convert the Republican party, and American conservatism in general, against their respective wills, into a new kind of conservative politics suitable to governing a modern democracy.”
– Irving Kristol (Jewish) ‘godfather of American neo-conservatism.’
Kristol eschewed any attempt to justify U.S. support for Israel in terms of American national interest:
“Large nations, whose identity is ideological, like the Soviet Union of yesteryear and the United States of today, inevitably have ideological interests in addition to more material concerns. That is why we feel it necessary to defend Israel today, when its survival is threatened. No complicated geopolitical calculations of national interest are necessary. ”
Ideological Origins: Israel First
Neoconservatism’s key founders trace their intellectual ancestry to the “New York Intellectuals, ” a group that originated as followers of Trotskite theoretician Max Schactman in the 1930s and centered around influential journals like Partisan Review and Commentary (which is published by the American Jewish Committee).
Key figures in leading the neocons away from calling themselves “leftists” and becoming “conservatives” were philosopher Sidney Hook and Elliott Cohen, editor of Commentary. The ideological kingpin of neoconservatism was Leo Strauss, a dedicated open Marxist devotee of Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein), the head of the Red Army who began the Red Terror in Russia.
Many of the leading neocons worked closely with Jewish activist organisations and it was only when the left began to be hostile towards the racist state of Israel, that these radical activists “abandoned” their Communist positions. By the 1970s, the Jewish neocons had adopted an aggressive stance against the Soviet Union, whose anti-Zionist policy they interpreted as “anti-semitism”.
Jewish neocon Richard Perle, for example, later to become infamous as one of the major players in engineering the 2003 war against Iraq, was the primer organiser of Congressional support for the 1974 Jackson-Vanik Amendment. This legislation linked bilateral trade with the Soviet Union to special dispensation for Jews to emigrate from the USSR, primarily to America and Israel.
As the neoconservatives lost faith in radical leftism, several neocons became attracted to the writings of Leo Strauss, a classicist and political philosopher at the University of Chicago. Strauss had a very strong Jewish identity and viewd his philosophy as a means of ensuring Jewish survival in the Diaspora. As he put it in a 1962 Hillel House lecture, later republished in Leo Strauss: Political Philosopher and Jewish Thinker:
“I believe I can say, without any exaggeration, that since a very, very early time the main theme of my reflections has been what is called the ‘Jewish Question.”
(The chapter continues by saying that the Iraq war was to date the neocons greatest coup and goes on to list many of the prominent Jewish members involved in bringing about that war).
In 1996, 7 years before any war in Iraq a strategy paper called ‘A clean break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm’ was prepared for the Israeli government which advocated a war against Iraq to protect Israel, the strategy was used almost to the letter by the neocons in generating war against Saddam Hussein.
The effects which these Trotskyite-origin “neocons” have had on America, and indeed the world, through their criminal wars in the Middle East on behalf of the Zionist state, was summed up by famous Jewish journalist Carl Bernstein, in 2013.
Bernstein is perhaps the most respected and honoured journalist in the United States. He was one of two reporters responsible for unearthing the Nixon Watergate scandal in 1973. Speaking on NBC televison’s “Morning-Jo” program, Bernstein stated explicitly that Jewish neocons were behind the Iraq war.
Bernstein’s exact words were:
“This was an insane war that brought us low economically, morally. We went to war against a guy who had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. It was a total pretext! It’s inexplicable and there you go to Cheney, there you go to bush, there you go to the Jewish neocons who wanted to remake the world. Maybe I can say that because I’m Jewish….”
So after reading the above it should now be pretty clear who the neoconservatives are and what their ideological origins are. Many of the Communists in Russia and who fully supported and participated in the Bolshevik revolution, actually moved to America and Israel as Communist Russia started to turn against them, they morphed from Jewish Communists into today’s Zionists in America and Israel who then turned on Communist Russia for its perceived anti-semitism. The Communist regime was, in the early 20th century, the Jewish form of global control, in the early days, Communism was heavily led, financed and made up of Jews. It afforded them the freedom to be Jews and to do what Jews wanted to do. Ultimately it failed, because it didn’t really spread outside of Russia and collapsed completely as a governmental and economic model in the latter part of the 20th century. It was internationalist in its aims, in the sense that it wanted to export Communist revolution across the West, but when it failed and the Jewish elements had left to go to America and Israel, they soon sunk their claws into the American administration and as we see today, America is almost completely controlled by Zionist influence in media, banking and foreign policy.
If you merely swap Communism for Zionism and understand that they are birds of a feather just with a different face nowadays, then you will see that Zionism, like Communism, is a form of Jewish financial, political, media and national control. Zionism is the new face of Jewish Communism. The difference being that now the Jews have a nation to operate out of ie Israel, a nation they control ie America, whereas in Russia they used Communism to gain control of a nation that wasn’t Jewish, and was, like so many before them, aware of Jewish subversion. The amount of Jews residing in Russia at that time meant that in Communism, which they created and funded, they found a vehicle to impose themselves onto that nation.
Just as they took control of Russia with violence and mass murder, they have taken control of America through subversion and the power of money.
A documentary on the Neoconservative movement:
Neoconservatives, who they are and their power in government.
Dr Kevin MacDonald on Neoconservatism:
Understanding Jewish Influence III:
Neoconservatism as a Jewish Movement by Kevin MacDonald.
Who Got us Into the Iraq War?
A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm (commonly known as the “Clean Break” report) is a policy document that was prepared in 1996 by a study group led by Richard Perle for Benjamin Netanyahu, the then Prime Minister of Israel. The report explained a new approach to solving Israel’s security problems in the Middle East with an emphasis on “Western values”. It has since been criticized for advocating an aggressive new policy including the removal of Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq, and the containment of Syria by engaging in proxy warfare and highlighting their possession of “weapons of mass destruction”.
4 thoughts on “The Origins of Jewish Neoconservatism”
” It began with the lies about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, then Libya and…”
It began long before that. But yeah, that is when most people began to recognize it.
Good article which you have posted on “Neo-Conservatism”; We, and our people, face these types of cultural subversions daily in our lives in America and elsewhere. Few people know where the subversive doctrines originated or who was responsible for the destructive social and political policies which these internationally (co)operating and racially cooperative jews have unleashed into society against our unsuspecting peoples.
“These Jews did not merely label their opponents as greedy, as was usually the case under classical Marxism. Instead, they declared their opponents to be mentally ill and incapable of accepting the truth until their inner life was radically altered.”
The quote below is from Part 4, but the link is to Part 1 of an tract which I think you will appreciate.
“The ideas of Cultural Marxism have become completely mainstream, and the breakdown of society over the past decades is the direct result of Cultural Marxism and its promotion by Jewish individuals and organizations. In conquering the West, Cultural Marxism has succeeded where the tanks and bombs of the Soviet army failed. Understanding the arguments of Cultural Marxism and being able to counter them is key if we are to have any hope of taking our country back.”
Yes, , the social sciences have been hijacked by Jewish intellectuals like Marx, who promoted class wasrfasre based on false propositions. The first division of labour was not between capital and labour, but between husband and wife. This made the husband the first imperialist and established the Jewish patriarchal capitalist system that exploited the unpaid sexual, reproductive and domestic labour of the wife in the modern nuclear families benefitting capitalism. By concentrating the anthropological discourse on race, the social sciences ignored the cultural economic aspects of different societies that empoweredwomen such as their role as in horticulture and marketing of local products and the Chinese family as a business corporation.